Shootings in Paris

[blueinsa]

" Psychological terrorism is a form of attack which may leave no physical marks or impact upon a person or group of people, but ultimately leaves psychological injuries or traumas that have a lasting impact".
OR
"Psychological terrorism is typically a form of terrorism that primarily targets people’s psychological well being and state of mind, with the intent of having a negative impact on those people ".

These are definition of Psychological Terrorism and when Muslims say they feel offended but apparently close to 2 billion people then its not freedom of speech of which we have seen a lot of double standards its "psychological terrorism " which have been given the color of freedom of expression .
..........................................................
People are quick to ridicule the idea and concept of false flag attacks as conspiracy theories but the truth is history is filled with false flags attacks ,some glaring examples are Second sino japenese war which resulted in Japan leaving the league of nations or The world war 2 ,it might be surprising but it did started with Germans false flag. This is just the list from Wikipedia ,no conspiracy theorist
<a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag</a>

In many or if not all criminal case investigation(chief investigating officer committing suicide in this case ) the first question that is worked on " who benefits from it ?" Was it Muslims who benefited ? i think the answer could genuinely be a big NO ,War lords ,probably yes ,Far right is already on the rise across europe ,USA is already getting more and more strict with their policies on their own citizen,the nsa scandal comes to mind,and Cameron just issued a statement he wants more scrutiny on internet usage etc,if you agree with more scrutiny policy i am sorry for bringing it up,and Their are so many questionable things in this attack ,
Cheif investigating officer commits suicide
Officer gets shot by a ak 47 on the street with no blood
Attackers committed such a sophisticated operation but left the id card in get away car ,like how they managed to find a passport from the ruble of Trade Towers but a building a good few yards away goes down due to heat .
And others.

The internet had a good laugh on fox news claiming birmingham "muslim only "city ,it was a blatant lie by a so called expert ,what makes you think that main stream media haven't lied before (iraq wmds) or are not lying now ,It could very well not be a false flag and all of these things could be a coincidence but at least we can think on other lines as well

Wibble.

False flags my arse fella.

In the same way you urge us all to start to understand the issues surrounding this one big mess, you do the same and acknowledge you have some fucking idiots going around murdering innocent people all over the world in the so called name of your prophet!

 

[SWP's back]

" Psychological terrorism is a form of attack which may leave no physical marks or impact upon a person or group of people, but ultimately leaves psychological injuries or traumas that have a lasting impact".
OR
"Psychological terrorism is typically a form of terrorism that primarily targets people’s psychological well being and state of mind, with the intent of having a negative impact on those people ".

These are definition of Psychological Terrorism and when Muslims say they feel offended but apparently close to 2 billion people then its not freedom of speech of which we have seen a lot of double standards its "psychological terrorism " which have been given the color of freedom of expression .

Much like the religious indoctrination which was forced on the adherants of your religion eh?

 

[BillyShears]

You cannot make constant posts slagging off people's point of view without providing an intelligent reply, then accuse others of attempting to derail a thread. I know we're not exactly University Challenge here but that's just taking the piss

Made plenty of pertinent points, thanks all the same for your input though.

It's just that every time I come on to this thread somebody makes a point and the I see a post of yours dismissing it in one sentence, mostly in an aggressive way.

I suppose that I think you might have something intelligent to say on these types of stuff and being the
Piers Morgan of Bluemoon isn't productive to anybody at all.

There's been a cartoon controversy vacuum which has needed filling since Fetlocks got his comeuppance. I see Swp's Back is trying desperately to fill those small shoes.

 

[SWP's back]

Made plenty of pertinent points, thanks all the same for your input though.

It's just that every time I come on to this thread somebody makes a point and the I see a post of yours dismissing it in one sentence, mostly in an aggressive way.

I suppose that I think you might have something intelligent to say on these types of stuff and being the
Piers Morgan of Bluemoon isn't productive to anybody at all.

There's been a cartoon controversy vacuum which has needed filling since Fetlocks got his comeuppance. I see Swp's Back is trying desperately to fill those small shoes.

Run along before I ruin your day poppet.

 

[johnmc]

You can't say there are 5000 honour killings in the world (whilst implying it is a unique phenomenon to the Muslim communities around the world), then when challenged on this, say "although I concede the numbers are unlikely to be accurate". That's the biggest load of bllocks ever.

I been on this thread all day. You challenged me earlier on something relating to homosexuality. I answered that and since then several other points have been levelled at me, which I feel I have answered.

You obviously have everything all worked out. All of your ill informed prejudices lined up in neat little rows like chess pieces. Ready to bring them into play whenever the previous piece is quickly removed from the board.

Those are the figures widely used but it is very likely the number is much higher. You yourself have used figures that are likely to be inaccurate in posts so not sure why its ok for you to do so then? I did challenge you on your belief homosexuality is a choice, and I would discuss further only you said it was off topic (and you knew you were talking nonsense) and asked to drop it, so I did. You hardly answered it. So I moved onto another topic. This thread has had many topics discussed, I didnt realise you were the authority on what could be discussed and by whom.

I don't have anything worked out, and I don't profess to. Part of the reason I come on here is to learn more and if my viewpoint is skewwed or wrong I can often find that out on here. BUT, given that your own views are clearly clouded, and one of these views seems to be homosexuality could be a choice, it is difficult to take what you say with any credibility.

 

[blueish swede]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

I think you are missing the point completely in this post. In Paris the publication of cartoons of Mohammed by, primarily Marxists, in a satirircal magazine was ”revenged” by a muslim exremist by the murder of four people in a Kosher shop because they were probabily Jewish.

People are "speaking out" in part because ”They” came for they Jews – again!

 

[hgblue]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Time for bed.

First they came for members of the armed forces, and I did not speak out.
Because I wasn't a member of the armed forces.

Then they came for the cartoonists, and I did not speak out.
Because I wasn't a cartoonist.

Then they came for the police, and I did not speak out.
Because I wasn't in the police.

Then they came for the gays, and I didn't speak out.
Because I wasn't gay.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for fourth place, and I laughed my cock off -
Because I'm not a rag.

Time for bed.

 

[Wio Gumflapdinand]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Time for bed.

<a class="postlink" href="http://youtu.be/OIoMfVNVx4g" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://youtu.be/OIoMfVNVx4g</a>
Congratulations

 

[Anonymous]

I'm beginning to question what his real views on atheism and atheists are. I don't get the impression he's being entirely honest with himself, judging by his more recent posts.

I have no particular views on atheists/atheism really and I am totally honest with myself, thanks.

What recent posts?.

Your essays attempting to 'absolve Islam' from blame when others have criticised it and its actions throughout history. For someone who is neither religious nor a Muslim, you certainly show an affection for it. Why show such care and defence from something you have no interest in? This is a football forum so how about a football analogy. For example have you ever defended United supporters and hate the fact City fans call them Rags as a term of insult? It's the same principle; you have a group of people who have a deep rooted passion which they chose and continue to choose to follow but are criticised by others. For many its a life choice, one they follow passionately to the grave and defend its honour throughout their lives. A far fetched comparison you might say? Not really, as many see the same about organised religion; its merely a choice no matter how passionately and dedicated their advocates might be. Would you defend with such vigour a United fans right to be treated with respect from rival supporters?

I just find it odd that someone who has no connection to the culture, the ethics or ideals of an entire community would have such passion in defending it against critics who have voiced genuine criticisms based solely on their rejection of its doctrine.

Does it fill you with more hate and anger that I would defend the evil Muslims?.

Do you feel I'm siding with the enemy?.

Did it bother you to read my thoughts on intermarriage with the enemy?.

After I mentioned intermarrying with Muslims, you could see the anti Islamic posters getting very upset with such a notion. I don't think they had ever considered that their children could intermarry and how it could be a very distinct possibility.

This was probably the reason you accused me of having a "white guilt complex".

They were soon disappearing from the thread with their little worlds crumbling at the thought. You could hear the collective gulp... It was wonderful, I just hope it was running around in their heads all night as they struggled to reconcile such a thought. I also hope it was the first thing they thought about this morning. ;-)

Your accusation of "white guilt complex" in this scenario is no different to being labelled a n****r lover growing up, just because I hung around with Black and Asian lads. (Well if it was a toss up between their kind and your kind.)

Thankfully the world has moved on, people like you are quickly being left behind. Your world is finished the Muslims are coming, BM will soon be under sharia law and our children/grandchildren will be intermarrying.

I for one cannot wait. It's practically the dream MLK had. Beautiful.