Shootings in Paris

[Dubai Blue]

18 ffs, Feel for the kid, brought up with the wrong people and now this.
Likely to spend his life in prison.

I think the older two did all the killing so he might get away with it.

WTF?

 

[EL APACHE TEVEZ]

18 ffs, Feel for the kid, brought up with the wrong people and now this.
Likely to spend his life in prison.

I think the older two did all the killing so he might get away with it.

Fuck the little ****, I would blow torch the shithouse.

 

[Pam]

[bigimg]http://the7truth7ministries7.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/if-religion-is-worth-killing.jpg?w=614[/bigimg]

 

[Monkfish]

18 ffs, Feel for the kid, brought up with the wrong people and now this.
Likely to spend his life in prison.

I think the older two did all the killing so he might get away with it.

Fuck the little c**t, I would blow torch the shithouse.

Before you do that make sure you know he spent the day playing mario kart and smokling weed when his mate came round and told him he was the most wanted man in france

 

[SWP's back]

A cartoon is not an act of violence, I'm sure me and my mates have that figured out thanks, even Gandhi might agree with that

If it is used as a deliberate, considered act of provocation, which it was, then it is exactly that.
When the Jyllands Posten newspaper originally published the cartoons, they said that this publication was an attempt to contribute to the debate about criticism of Islam and self-censorship.
In other words a deliberate provocation.
It was that act that has led to today's tragedy.

Fucking hell. Hang your head in fucking shame you utter ****.

Very much this.

He probably think Monty Python was beyond the pale as well.

 

[SWP's back]

You have amply demonstrated what i have trying to tell everybody all along i.e. one persons perfectly reasonable and factually true comment can be offensive to another person in whose view the author deserves all the abuse he gets.
One persons free speech it would seem is more sacred than the other's and free speech does cause offence.

Thank you Stony for illustrating this.

You going to fully illustrate by suicide bombing the south stand then?

I'll quote you but reply to all my other critics at the same time in a final post because it's getting to my bedtime and i do have work in the morning.
I am a proponent of non violence, free speech and personal freedoms. What i do not condone is making inflammatory remarks specifically designed to inflame or provoke a particular group. E.g crying fire in the proverbial theatre. I believe in rights but i also believe in responsibilities. If you are going to make a malicious provocation and not expect a reaction, then you are stupid as well as malicious.Which is what the Jyllands Posten newspaper by their own admission did. Only they knew there would be a reaction but were not concerned what the consequences might be.
We need to promote free speech but not at the cost of deliberately singling out one religious, ethnic or racial group.
I hope there will no more cartoons printed, not because we have lost the battle but because it is the right thing to do.
May you all go in peace.

Go to hell.

 

[EalingBlue2]

If it is used as a deliberate, considered act of provocation, which it was, then it is exactly that.
When the Jyllands Posten newspaper originally published the cartoons, they said that this publication was an attempt to contribute to the debate about criticism of Islam and self-censorship.
In other words a deliberate provocation.
It was that act that has led to today's tragedy.

Fucking hell. Hang your head in fucking shame you utter c**t.

Very much this.

He probably think Monty Python was beyond the pale as well.

In the U.S. there were some pretty serious threats against the pythons, the distributors and cinemas over this to stop the release also many area/councils of the UK banned or tried to ban it and there were large protests against it that occurred outside cinemas especially in the US. It is fair to say it was controversial and far from accepted.

 

[SWP's back]

I am losing it, having just listened to three idiots in succession (Five Live Call-in) calling for a law banning people being "offensive" about religious icons.

we should just have a law banning religious icons and their nutjob followers especially those backward zealots that clearly care more about the ''rights'' of their fairy tale characters than they do about the actual rights of fellow human beings

So your idea here is that we should fight zealousness with zealousness?

That's how one generally rids a body of cancer, yes.

 

[SWP's back]

Fucking hell. Hang your head in fucking shame you utter c**t.

Very much this.

He probably think Monty Python was beyond the pale as well.

In the U.S. there were some pretty serious threats against the pythons, the distributors and cinemas over this to stop the release also many area/councils of the UK banned or tried to ban it and there were large protests against it that occurred outside cinemas especially in the US. It is fair to say it was controversial and far from accepted.

Was anyone killed?

Do the Python team live in fear?

Freedom of speech means people that were offended had the right to protest. But the film wasn't cancelled or banned was it. Everyone had their say and then moved on.

 

[dronefromsector7g]

Another shooting just now, two cops injured.