Should we be looking at new kit deal?- new update pg34 Chelsea NIKE DEAL

lucashm said:
Say whatever you want about us, but the fact is, we are the 3th team who sells the most jerseys in the world, and one of the most marketable teams on the world, yeah we had a bad season, but that doesnt affect our image out there one bit, and are still much more marketable than City is right now, so signing us for Nike and giving us that much money makes an awful lot of sense for them
Click to expand...
This deal will seem like a bad move in a couple of years even taking into account Chelsea are arguably in a period of stagnation.
The length of the contract is a mistake as with the growth of the premier league globally Chelsea will either be earning peanuts in 5-10 years or will have to buy out of it at considerable cost to the club.
We on the other hand are in the process of expanding at a steady pace and have to consider carefully our next deal.
We should be looking at as short a deal as possible as we're likely to be in a stronger position in a few years.We could probably get a higher value deal long term but should look for a similar yearly value as Chelsea but on half the length of contract hopefully.
 
rabby said:
This deal will seem like a bad move in a couple of years even taking into account Chelsea are arguably in a period of stagnation.
The length of the contract is a mistake as with the growth of the premier league globally Chelsea will either be earning peanuts in 5-10 years or will have to buy out of it at considerable cost to the club.
We on the other hand are in the process of expanding at a steady pace and have to consider carefully our next deal.
We should be looking at as short a deal as possible as we're likely to be in a stronger position in a few years.We could probably get a higher value deal long term but should look for a similar yearly value as Chelsea but on half the length of contract hopefully.
Click to expand...
We're get a bigger deal as we are more marketable CFG v cfc
 
rabby said:
This deal will seem like a bad move in a couple of years even taking into account Chelsea are arguably in a period of stagnation.
The length of the contract is a mistake as with the growth of the premier league globally Chelsea will either be earning peanuts in 5-10 years or will have to buy out of it at considerable cost to the club.
We on the other hand are in the process of expanding at a steady pace and have to consider carefully our next deal.
We should be looking at as short a deal as possible as we're likely to be in a stronger position in a few years.We could probably get a higher value deal long term but should look for a similar yearly value as Chelsea but on half the length of contract hopefully.
Click to expand...
Nobody knows exactly the lenght of the contract, but the truth is,these contracts are usually renegotiated, very rarely do these contracts run their full course, for example, we still had 6 years on our Adidas deal, but since Nike stepped in and offered us, what is the third biggest kit deal in football today, we simply bought out of the contract.
If we feel we are being lowballed, we will just find other kit provider, like we did with Adidas, and Samsung, also no matter how you slice it, 60M is a huge sum of money, and trying to make like we made a bad deal is silly IMO
 
Well watching the melbourne derby on BT and nike have give city a decent version of the shit template in white and sky blue which we could easily have had as a 2nd or 3rd kit rather than our shit ones so nike can fuck off
 
lucashm said:
Nobody knows exactly the lenght of the contract, but the truth is,these contracts are usually renegotiated, very rarely do these contracts run their full course, for example, we still had 6 years on our Adidas deal, but since Nike stepped in and offered us, what is the third biggest kit deal in football today, we simply bought out of the contract.
If we feel we are being lowballed, we will just find other kit provider, like we did with Adidas, and Samsung, also no matter how you slice it, 60M is a huge sum of money, and trying to make like we made a bad deal is silly IMO
Click to expand...
I'm not saying it's a bad deal but to buy out the last six years of this contract it would cost you around 360 million, not a figure to be taken lightly. I believe it's a good deal but as people have pointed out in ten years time it could be a low deal but for now it's a great one. I would rather get a smaller deal from a more unique manufacturer. Like most people on here I miss umbro.
 
dachoosen1 said:
I'm not saying it's a bad deal but to buy out the last six years of this contract it would cost you around 360 million, not a figure to be taken lightly. I believe it's a good deal but as people have pointed out in ten years time it could be a low deal but for now it's a great one. I would rather get a smaller deal from a more unique manufacturer. Like most people on here I miss umbro.
Click to expand...
I think it all depends on how many shirts we sell, if we keep selling as we are now, i doubt Nike will be unwilling to renegotiate, but i understand your point, but honestly we cant predict these kind of things, so as of now, regardless of what happens in the future, its a fantastic deal for us
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.