johnmc said:blinkblue said:johnmc said:Nirvana defined a generation? No chance. Since when was grunge a major event in music. Nirvana had 5 or 6 great songs. That doesn't make them a grey band and doesn't define generations. How many albums did they make?
And foo fighters? Dont make me laugh.
Nirvana have contributed more to music than pretty much every band in the past 22 years.
And the Foo Fighters are currently one of the biggest bands on the planet and have headlined every major festival and sold out Wembley. Don't see what's funny about them John.
Please explain what Nirvana have contributed to Music. And explain how they defined a generation. I was at high school when they were out. Maybe 2 people liked them. It's funny how they went from being good to being great after he shot himself. No doubt we will be seeing similar comments about Amy Winehouse soon. Truth is they were talent and produced a couple of classic tracks but in respect of defining a generation well that generation must have passed me by and must have been filled with miserable fookers who would never have been happy. Nirvana did not define jack.
As for Foo fighters. They sell out 3 gigs in the uk? So that means what. Can I remind you take that sold our ground out ten times over. Bon Jovi sold out wembley arena ten times over. Are we judging bands by ticket sales because if so Foo Fighters dont win that competition.
Can I just ask your age out of interest?
Nevermind changed the course of popular culture at the time, they pioneered a genre, have been sited by countless bands since as a main inspiration. They contributed a lot to the industry. And I never claimed they defined a generation mate, I just think they were an important band.
I don't really see what your point is on the Foo's, I never claimed they were anything but one of the biggest bands currently active in the world today, which they are.
I don't see what my age has to do with anything.