so i'll ask again........

cleavers said:
sixlashes said:
balotelli will get the 1st red card ever, for a" menacing or aggressive stare" you seen it here first
You've not been a City fan long, we've in the not so recent past had a player sent off for "aggressive walking" towards a ref, and another for licking an opponent.

reading not your strong suit then?
 
nellyonthewing said:
There is a worrying side to all this. What will the Sheik & his advisors make of recent events.
City at the end of the day are their brand just like Etihad . If that name gets tarnished even unjustly by a biased anti City media what damage does that do to the brand and do you keep it or ditch it?
One risk is they say Mancini is not managing the risk and dump im (and Balotelli) or they add the Cooke incident and all this and say is it worth it.?

Just voicing my worst fears..


No chance, not even the slightest. The investment will continue in the infrastructure of the club, the worlds best academy - sports science and training facilty will be complete within 5 years. They are here for the long haul and if anything would damage their reputation it would be walking away and admitting they couldnt handle it. Forget those fears, they are totally unfounded.
 
ste.sully said:
Has anyone seen this article?

....

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-city/9033296/Should-police-look-in-to-Mario-Balotellis-stamp-on-Scott-Parker-during-Manchester-Citys-win-over-Tottenham.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... enham.html</a>

Disgraceful to try and get the police involved. I always knew the Telegraph was a Tory piece of shit, but this only intensifies the sentiment further that the media are trying to destablise the club.

And in this case defame it by trying to get a player prosecuted. The writer of the article knows he's out of order, hence why their is no accreditation of authorship on the article.

I see Karl Henry has got an article calling for him to be prosecuted, I wonder why....?

There are a handful of us City fans commenting on the Telegraph fighting off hordes of rags and cockneys..Please join in and help us out
 
nellyonthewing said:
There is a worrying side to all this. What will the Sheik & his advisors make of recent events.
City at the end of the day are their brand just like Etihad . If that name gets tarnished even unjustly by a biased anti City media what damage does that do to the brand and do you keep it or ditch it?
One risk is they say Mancini is not managing the risk and dump im (and Balotelli) or they add the Cooke incident and all this and say is it worth it.?

Just voicing my worst fears..


Etihad are NOT owned by Sheik Mansour.
 
Ducado said:
You know

If there is an agenda or not an agenda, it certainley feels like the club are disliked by the media, which leads people to think there is an agenda, if seems we can't do anything right in their eyes, and it has been like this for a while.

But one does get the feeling that they are using the Mario incident to cover up their blushes for over hyping spuds all last week, I think they know that there is every likelihood with their run of games they are going to start slipping.

I await with baited breath what will be said if Saint Harry of the Brown Envelope does get found guilty! What's worse a minor incident on a football pitch or stealing money (because that is what he is accused of) of the people of this country!
We're the new bad guys. This is how they painted Chelsea when they threatened the unending success of the rags, Arsenal and to an ever decreasing extent liverpool. I always liked the fact that Chelsea were winning the league as it felt good to have some new blood winning trophies for a change. But this country (and especially its press) is nothing if not conservative/reactionary. Still, there's something invitable about our rise to success so let's just remember who said what so that we can gloat when the time comes (childish, I know, but so what).
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/inter/?action=read&idnet=ZmNpbnRlcm5ld3MuaXQtNzAyMjg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/inter/?a ... XQtNzAyMjg</a>

mario's agent just said said:
"Se in Inghilterra ha tutti contro, se ne andrà! Non si gioca a calcio solo in Premier".

quick translation : "if in england everyone is against balotelli he'll go away. football isn't played only in england"

this has always been their target , it seem they are getting it.
 
Mancio said:
http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/inter/?action=read&idnet=ZmNpbnRlcm5ld3MuaXQtNzAyMjg

mario's agent just said said:
"Se in Inghilterra ha tutti contro, se ne andrà! Non si gioca a calcio solo in Premier".


quick translation : "if in england everyone is against balotelli he'll go away. football isn't played only in england"

this has always been their target , it seem they are getting it.


Diddums.
 
Balotelli has been a disaster waiting to happen, on this occasion we got away with three points.One thing for sure is it will make us and the club and lads on the pitch stronger.Im not buying this agenda angle. Spurs have an equal amount of gripes as us. I'd be pissed off if that was us on the receiving end yesterday.Its referee inconsistancys that's the root of the problem. The FA are going to support the referee all the time.

Let's move on blues FFS
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.