Pigeonho said:Explain how there is red in there when what we are talking about is a supposed agenda towards united? We could be talking about Chelsea, Arsenal or Norwich for all I care, but don't make the silly, idiotic mistake of thinking that just because I don't subscribe to the agenda like you and others, it makes me less of a City fan, because that would be really stupid of you and somewhat immature.KentBlue said:You seem to be a nice enough chap, Pidge. But you really should change your name to 'Purple Pidge', 'cos for a Blue there's a helluva lot of red in there.
-- Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:05 pm --
Ok, so how did they ensure we won it that year then? When Fergie and his troops were 12 points ahead, were they given the message to 'let City win'? Was that why Everton drew 4-4 there? Were we told the opposite, to ensure we win every game to catch them up? Were Newcastle told to make sure under no circumstances that they were to score, and that we were to win? Was Balotelli told to miss his chance in the QPR game, to allow Aguero the moment the entire world, it seemed, watched?KenTheLandlord said:Pigeonho said:I'm fully aware they are different competitions.
ok good so far, now look at the next bit who controls that?
Thats right the PL. Oh they needed us to win that, in a world in recession a nerve wracking finale on the eve of contrat negotiations would be great. The bank balance soared and money pumped into the PL.
A proper naughty scoundrel would then ask the question. Would fergy stand for that? Well, if he won the league the next season thus ensuring a fantastic sign off into retirement. winning with the worst ever team by a comfortable margin, who knows.........
not that that would happen of course.
Gray said:He's talking utter rubbish as most administrators do, just look at Plattini.
The glory hunting foreigners will just pick out another team to follow for a few years and have to spend even more money buying their new teams kit.
If the Scum fade into obscurity (hopefully) they will soon be forgotten as if the never existed in the first place.
I can't believe you are being serious, but i'll reply all the same.KenTheLandlord said:Pigeonho said:Explain how there is red in there when what we are talking about is a supposed agenda towards united? We could be talking about Chelsea, Arsenal or Norwich for all I care, but don't make the silly, idiotic mistake of thinking that just because I don't subscribe to the agenda like you and others, it makes me less of a City fan, because that would be really stupid of you and somewhat immature.KentBlue said:You seem to be a nice enough chap, Pidge. But you really should change your name to 'Purple Pidge', 'cos for a Blue there's a helluva lot of red in there.
-- Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:05 pm --
Ok, so how did they ensure we won it that year then? When Fergie and his troops were 12 points ahead, were they given the message to 'let City win'? Was that why Everton drew 4-4 there? Were we told the opposite, to ensure we win every game to catch them up? Were Newcastle told to make sure under no circumstances that they were to score, and that we were to win? Was Balotelli told to miss his chance in the QPR game, to allow Aguero the moment the entire world, it seemed, watched?KenTheLandlord said:ok good so far, now look at the next bit who controls that?
Thats right the PL. Oh they needed us to win that, in a world in recession a nerve wracking finale on the eve of contrat negotiations would be great. The bank balance soared and money pumped into the PL.
A proper naughty scoundrel would then ask the question. Would fergy stand for that? Well, if he won the league the next season thus ensuring a fantastic sign off into retirement. winning with the worst ever team by a comfortable margin, who knows.........
not that that would happen of course.
did you not think that 4-4 was odd at the time?
Newcastle could have scored and still lost.
At the start of the match the title was in the balance, that was important. Then as long as we won it wouldn't really matter who got the winner. Panned out very nicely though, dont you think?
Start looking in the right places for agendas like the other nutters thenPigeonho said:I'm fully aware they are different competitions.KenTheLandlord said:Pigeonho said:Nothing to see DN, from our point of view, other than 4 domestic trophies in 6 years. I would imagine that someone at the head of an agenda wouldn't want the cross-city rivals of their so called darling being put in the shade like that - especially when one of those trophies was won by knocking them out and the other bringing us a worldwide audience like none ever seen before that. If they didn't want us to win it, they would have ensured that was the case.
The PL have no jurisdiction in FA cups. They cannot control that nor FL related activities.
The fact that a team can win different trophies is irrelevant , great for non agenda theorists but doesn't mean there are agendas about. Maybe they are just in places you don't look.
We have 3 different organisations with a hell of a lot power and wealth, they are wanting what is right for them and them alone. Their inability to work together can be seen in the England team. All other nations have one governing body, one path and one vision. If ours took that step than people would lose their "kudos", their self serving jobs and interests. That is where the agenda lies.
RandomJ said:I can't beleive what I'm reading from some posters here. If you think the Prem League is rigged like WWE then you might as well start wearing a tin foil hat so the government can't read your thoughts. It's just laughable. I think Scudamoes commnets are out of order and he needs to be held accountable for saying stuff like that but maybe some of you need to realise that maybe just maybe the reason the rags won so often is they had a good team and a good manager and not some secret agenda to keep the money rolling in.