so what do we do?

[Bill]

I do enjoy the forum.

I know I'll get a ban for this (although I genuinely do hope that I don't), but can you explain how anything that I have posted is 'moaning' ?

I am - as far as I am aware - defending my right not to believe a posters' supposed ITKness, especially given his abysmal record thus far this summer.

I do hope that a similar post is aimed at those who feel the need to attack those who do not believe TH.

How many fucking times do you need telling? You have repeatedly stated despite being told numerous times that he doesn't, that TH talks nonsense. You try to defend it by saying 'but he's allowed to' as if that is some kind of good thing.

Here it is for you once and for all; Had you been around for longer than 5 minutes you would realise that TH has got a lot of things right in the past and not only that, the stuff you think 'he hears' isn't that he hears it but it's his job to know it.

Let that be your cue to shut the fuck up.

Erudite. Clearly mis-judged, but erudite.

As a pointer, as there seems to be a time/post limit before posters are allowed to have an opinion, how long must TH be wrong for before he is no longer ITK ?

i hope you dont mind but i am going to fuck you off, you have contributed nothing since your arrival but before i do i will answer your question.
how long must TH be wrong to be no longer an ITK?
a, makes not one jot of difference as its no longer anything to do with you.

your obsession with the guy is a little freaky and must be a real pain for you to deal with, i hope by removing you from the forum i have helped you somewhat.

 

[pennypennytannerbob]

I'm open to criticism. Go ahead.

But, just as I believe that ITK's or KFA's should be banned, I don't believe that those who dissent against them should be banned.

I believe in everyone's right to post what they want as long as it doesn't descend into name-calling.

Yet some people on the TH side would prefer that dissenters were banned.

That bolded part in your post is what we in the business like to call a Freudian slip.

It's called 'doing 10 things at once', but take it how you wanna. :-D

-- Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:10 pm --

Erudite. Clearly mis-judged, but erudite.

As a pointer, as there seems to be a time/post limit before posters are allowed to have an opinion, how long must TH be wrong for before he is no longer ITK ?

What are you waffling on about now? You're doing a lot of talking but not actually saying anything.

Should I post a youtube link and not actually say anything instead ?

That's the spirit :-D

 

[malg]

For what it's worth Lost, I don't think you just moan. I think you have made some fair points - you have just upset the elite

Just my opinion of course, but that elite/clique seems to be getting more vociferous over the last 6-12 months. It gets to be like a feeding frenzy on here at times.

 

[oakiecokie]

I'm open to criticism. Go ahead.

But, just as I believe that ITK's or KFA's should be banned, I don't believe that those who dissent against them should be banned.

I believe in everyone's right to post what they want as long as it doesn't descend into name-calling.

Yet some people on the TH side would prefer that dissenters were banned.

That bolded part in your post is what we in the business like to call a Freudian slip.

It's called 'doing 10 things at once', but take it how you wanna. :-D

-- Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:10 pm --

Erudite. Clearly mis-judged, but erudite.

As a pointer, as there seems to be a time/post limit before posters are allowed to have an opinion, how long must TH be wrong for before he is no longer ITK ?

What are you waffling on about now? You're doing a lot of talking but not actually saying anything.

Should I post a youtube link and not actually say anything instead ?

I think its more "How to not make friends and certainly not influence people"
As others have suggested I believe you to be an old user,who probably has been "removed" before and now just looking to shit stir.

 

[Danamy]

I do enjoy the forum.

I know I'll get a ban for this (although I genuinely do hope that I don't), but can you explain how anything that I have posted is 'moaning' ?

I am - as far as I am aware - defending my right not to believe a posters' supposed ITKness, especially given his abysmal record thus far this summer.

I do hope that a similar post is aimed at those who feel the need to attack those who do not believe TH.

How many fucking times do you need telling? You have repeatedly stated despite being told numerous times that he doesn't, that TH talks nonsense. You try to defend it by saying 'but he's allowed to' as if that is some kind of good thing.

Here it is for you once and for all; Had you been around for longer than 5 minutes you would realise that TH has got a lot of things right in the past and not only that, the stuff you think 'he hears' isn't that he hears it but it's his job to know it.

Let that be your cue to shut the fuck up.

Erudite. Clearly mis-judged, but erudite.

As a pointer, as there seems to be a time/post limit before posters are allowed to have an opinion, how long must TH be wrong for before he is no longer ITK ?

I just don't see what the issue is to be honest?

You don't believe he's ITK = your opinion = don't read his posts
Others believe he's ITK = their opinion = read posts with interest

Not that hard to follow surely?

Just to add, the above post is for both sides of the fence

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

That bolded part in your post is what we in the business like to call a Freudian slip.

It's called 'doing 10 things at once', but take it how you wanna. :-D

-- Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:10 pm --

What are you waffling on about now? You're doing a lot of talking but not actually saying anything.

Should I post a youtube link and not actually say anything instead ?

I think its more "How to not make friends and certainly not influence people"
As others have suggested I believe you to be an old user,who probably has been "removed" before and now just looking to shit stir.

A thought that had occurred to me as well my friend.

 

[fairyfeet]

I'm open to criticism. Go ahead.

But, just as I believe that ITK's or KFA's should be banned, I don't believe that those who dissent against them should be banned.

I believe in everyone's right to post what they want as long as it doesn't descend into name-calling.

Yet some people on the TH side would prefer that dissenters were banned.

That bolded part in your post is what we in the business like to call a Freudian slip.

It's called 'doing 10 things at once', but take it how you wanna. :-D

-- Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:10 pm --

Erudite. Clearly mis-judged, but erudite.

As a pointer, as there seems to be a time/post limit before posters are allowed to have an opinion, how long must TH be wrong for before he is no longer ITK ?

What are you waffling on about now? You're doing a lot of talking but not actually saying anything.

Should I post a youtube link and not actually say anything instead ?

When you find yourself in a hole the first rule is to stop digging. I have. You've made your point, i'd back off now i were you.

 

[Bill]

How many fucking times do you need telling? You have repeatedly stated despite being told numerous times that he doesn't, that TH talks nonsense. You try to defend it by saying 'but he's allowed to' as if that is some kind of good thing.

Here it is for you once and for all; Had you been around for longer than 5 minutes you would realise that TH has got a lot of things right in the past and not only that, the stuff you think 'he hears' isn't that he hears it but it's his job to know it.

Let that be your cue to shut the fuck up.

Erudite. Clearly mis-judged, but erudite.

As a pointer, as there seems to be a time/post limit before posters are allowed to have an opinion, how long must TH be wrong for before he is no longer ITK ?

I just don't see what the issue is to be honest?

You don't believe he's ITK = your opinion = don't read his posts
Others believe he's ITK = their opinion = read posts with interest

Not that hard to follow surely?

sorry mate he's gone. you would have been next to cop for it :)

 

[Ric]

People are perfectly entitled to question the validity of any rumours posted on here, but it should be done respectfully. If you don't believe that someone has genuine info then just take what they say with a pinch of salt. Don't labour the point ad nauseum every time that user posts any gossip. That applies to anyone who shares info on here, not just Tolmie's Hairdoo.

I think the fact it's the school holidays, coupled with City's inactivity this summer, has accentuated things but everyone needs to relax a bit. It's only a forum for discussing rumours after all, and we're all Blues. No need to be at each other's throats all the time.

 

[jay_mcfc]

People are perfectly entitled to question the validity of any rumours posted on here, but it should be done respectfully. If you don't believe that someone has genuine info then just take what they say with a pinch of salt. Don't labour the point ad nauseum every time that user posts any gossip. That applies to anyone who shares info on here, not just Tolmie's Hairdoo.

I think the fact it's the school holidays, coupled with City's inactivity this summer, has accentuated things but everyone needs to relax a bit. It's only a forum for discussing rumours after all, and we're all Blues. No need to be at each other's throats all the time.

Can someone not ban this clown