ssg2 said:
Exactly but some of the idiots on here can't see that.
Your owners want you to be like united, opening cafes in malaysia, having 10,000 local fans and 60,000 out of towners who will spend spend spend in the megastore.
All the little points that you slag united for will come around and bite you on the arse.
We'll have Quentin from Surrey on 606 complaining about Mark Hughes in August....good luck
Possibly, but we will never lose the core City fans attitude, and that is our greatest defence against the criticism.
The problem is, most United fans are under the age of 30. These fans have been used to winning trophies for the past 18 years, most of their adult lifes. Finishing second is an absolute disaster for them, as is three trophyless seasons in a row. This makes them incredibly blinkered and arrogant to the rest of the footballing world. It's not their fault, it's the culture of the club that has fostered under Ferguson. An undeserved sense of grandeur, an unwillingness to take anybody else's opinion, a complete refusal to laugh with other fans at their own team. For them, football is serious business, and winning is the only thing. You know what? I don't think this is a particularly good trait in a fan.
City fans of the same age have seen year upon year of shit. We have been forced to grow up with a gallows humour, and an acceptance of our faults. We can't just sweep them away when they are glaring directly at us. The whole culture of our club is different, as is shown by the jibes at City now coming out of the United fanbase. 'Undeserved, no history, small club' are all tenets of a fans who has no appreciation for the history of their own club. Martin Edwards was the Sheik before the Sheik. United were known as mega-spenders all the way back in the early 20th century (if Gary James is reading, perhaps he can confirm or deny this). United's fanbase was always smaller than City's in the Manchester area, back when that sort of thing was important. I distinctly remember my grandad telling me how people used to laugh at United for 'importing fans' from Ireland and London back in the pre-war days.
The United fans of today know only success, whereas City know both sides of the footballing coin. In a sense, United fans really don't appreciate the full game, and can probably name about two teams below the Championship without looking them up (and they will either be local/United have played them in a friendly recently). If I ask the typical United fan who has just won League 1, most wouldn't have an idea, whereas a lot City fans would (in my experience).
United are a global club, and revel inside of that. They are essentially a nomad club, with no real roots in a city. of course, the Newton Heath days were different, but as the 90's took off, the club lost it's connection to the area.
When we welcome Tevez to Manchester, we don't just do it geographically.
All of the signs coming out of City are different, we are making a connection to our heritage and our city in a previously unknown manner. We are associating the brand of Manchester City with the city of Manchester. Cook has said these exact words himself.
Yes, we might inherit 50,000 plastics. That's fine, they can buy the shirts, the mugs and the bedspreads to boost our already overwhelming coffers. But the one difference between United and City, is that we will never lose our connection to our city, and sell out it's own people in favour of the other markets. Spiritually and geographically, we will always remain MANCHESTER City.