Something to cheer you all up, Buck house facelift

Wrong on both accounts so lets have a referendum and me and the peasants will lead the revolt.

You and the establishment can fight for her and the hangers on and just keep warning us how it will create armageddon without her head on bank notes and postage stamps.

Will cost a fortune to get rid of the queen as head of state, to be replaced by a President, great more costly elections and another raft of politician cunts with their nose in the trough, rather than a monarch that more than pays for themselves. No doubt Bliar will throw his hat in the ring, theres a great reason for keeping the queen if ever I heard one.
 
Wrong on both accounts so lets have a referendum and me and the peasants will lead the revolt.

You and the establishment can fight for her and the hangers on and just keep warning us how it will create armageddon without her head on bank notes and postage stamps.
You've not yet apologised for your erroneous OP.

And whilst I'm super important, it's not me that decides when to call referenda, so take your barking up another tree and stop side tracking the thread you.
 
@Mike D can we get an apology for your OP for misleading the forum about who is paying? (Her own Crown Estate)

You can argue about whether her inherited right to it is correct in another thread but by law she has it and the taxpayers are paying nothing towards it this work on the Palace.
Just to clarify, from their own website:

The Crown Estate belongs to the reigning monarch 'in right of The Crown', that is, it is owned by the monarch for the duration of their reign, by virtue of their accession to the throne. But it is not the private property of the monarch - it cannot be sold by the monarch, nor do revenues from it belong to the monarch.

The Government also does not own The Crown Estate. It is managed by an independent organisation - established by statute - headed by a Board (also known as The Crown Estate Commissioners), and the surplus revenue from the estate is paid each year to the Treasury for the benefit of the nation's finances.

So it's not the queen's personal property, and it's true to say that the money going towards paying for these renovations are being taken out of what would otherwise have been "paid each year to the Treasury for the benefit of the nation's finances."
 
Fucking Communists on this thread need to have a bit of a think about it, how many jobs and income is generated from tourism, outside of the crown estate that pays a lot of tax. The queen more than pays her own way, its all the lower level in the monarchy that need cutting loose and be made to get a 'proper job'.

And in that lies the problem there are so many of them taking the piss.Take Fergie for example apart from ghost writing a crap kids book and sucking that nobs toes never done stroke. I bet she hardly moves that fat arse of the sofa watching Jeremy Kyle, and Judge Rinder all day long.

Even the one that does sort of have a job Charlie is a tax avoiders costing us millions in lost tax revenue pretending his company is a charity. Isn’t it funny how SWP never brings that one up when he’s spouting off about what the crown estate brings in.
 
And in that lies the problem there are so many of them taking the piss.Take Fergie for example apart from ghost writing a crap kids book and sucking that nobs toes never done stroke. I bet she hardly moves that fat arse of the sofa watching Jeremy Kyle, and Judge Rinder all day long.

Even the one that does sort of have a job Charlie is a tax avoiders costing us millions in lost tax revenue pretending his company is a charity. Isn’t it funny how SWP never brings that one up when he’s spouting off about what the crown estate brings in.

Its not the queen or her immediate family (and even their ex wives) that are the issue, they do a lot of work for the nation and should be cherished rather than derided. Charles has raised more money for charity than any non monarch royal in British history, so not sure why you are having a go at him and his mother brings in £1.4bn to charities each year, all outside of the money in tourism and the crown estate brings in. Just scrapping the royal family, will leave a hole in our society, finance and culture.
 
Its not the queen or her immediate family (and even their ex wives) that are the issue, they do a lot of work for the nation and should be cherished rather than derided. Charles has raised more money for charity than any non monarch royal in British history, so not sure why you are having a go at him and his mother brings in £1.4bn to charities each year, all outside of the money in tourism and the crown estate brings in. Just scrapping the royal family, will leave a hole in our society, finance and culture.
Pay per view deportations back to space?
 
Just to clarify, from their own website:



So it's not the queen's personal property, and it's true to say that the money going towards paying for these renovations are being taken out of what would otherwise have been "paid each year to the Treasury for the benefit of the nation's finances."
Exactly my point. Well found buddy.

It's not the taxpayers footing the bill but the Queen's Crown Estate ("the Crown Estate belongs to the reigning monarch")
 
Fucking Communists on this thread need to have a bit of a think about it, how many jobs and income is generated from tourism, outside of the crown estate that pays a lot of tax. The queen more than pays her own way, its all the lower level in the monarchy that need cutting loose and be made to get a 'proper job'.
Quite right mate. Tourism would grind to a halt in this country if it wasn't for Liz and her brood. They're the only reason anyone ever comes here.
 
Its not the queen or her immediate family (and even their ex wives) that are the issue, they do a lot of work for the nation and should be cherished rather than derided. Charles has raised more money for charity than any non monarch royal in British history, so not sure why you are having a go at him and his mother brings in £1.4bn to charities each year, all outside of the money in tourism and the crown estate brings in. Just scrapping the royal family, will leave a hole in our society, finance and culture.

But think about all the real estate and the income from the crown we wouldn't have to pay her and the leaches back?
 
Quite right mate. Tourism would grind to a halt in this country if it wasn't for Liz and her brood. They're the only reason anyone ever comes here.

Naah not the nearest any of these tourists will ever get to her and the family is the waxworks in madame toussades.
 
And in that lies the problem there are so many of them taking the piss.Take Fergie for example apart from ghost writing a crap kids book and sucking that nobs toes never done stroke. I bet she hardly moves that fat arse of the sofa watching Jeremy Kyle, and Judge Rinder all day long.

Even the one that does sort of have a job Charlie is a tax avoiders costing us millions in lost tax revenue pretending his company is a charity. Isn’t it funny how SWP never brings that one up when he’s spouting off about what the crown estate brings in.
Oh yes I'm always always railing at being legally avoiding tax. Cunts the lot of them.
 
well I like the queen, and would trust her more than any politician that has ever lived, except maybe farage as he truly loves GB
 
So all the whingers think we should do what with this iconic national monument? Just let it crumble? How about the Eiffel tower - let it rust away? The leaning tower of Pisa - let it fall to the ground?
Perhaps we should redevelop the Sphinx and the great Pyramids for social housing...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top