Spanish Gaz.

[quiet_riot]

Sorry, I misinterpreted what you wrote, I thought you meant that none of the goals were his fault!

That's why I love this game, as me and you can both look at the same incidents and see them completely differently :)

Absolutely. I reckon it'd be so boring if we all agreed anyway.

 

[Bigga]

What do you mean??

According to many 'fans' he's sh*t!! Worst player at the club!! Get rid!!

After all, they know what they're talking about! After all, Hughes thought so too!

City fans, ffs...

He scored a freekick. That has nothing to do with how good he is at the position he actually plays in. It's amazing that you are willing to change your opinion of a lad because of 30 minutes. If you8 already thought Garrido was good, perhaps we just have different opinions of what the job of a LB is.

I still think he's crap. He's far too weak (though to be fair he has bulked a little), he is still positionally bad, he was lazy, he isn't great in a tackle and he isn't great in the air. What he can do though, is take players on, have a bit of pace, whack a FK, and pass the ball/cross well. He's a winger, never a LB.

He has a long way to make up for his performance in the 6-0 against Chelsea. That day, he literally cost us 4 or 5 goals.

You're choosing which post to react to? I made another one before you made this one! Anyway, I have ALWAYS backed the lad. Someone on here said Sven made him second choice as well. But, that is such a stupid statement when you look at the fact he was bought for his POTENTIAL! First season in a tough league and a learning curve.

Even saying that, in my eyes, there was not too much between Bridge and himself. The plus side being Garrido can play as a left midfielder and free kick deliverer when on and needed.

 

[kun]

he's an average defender who takes good free kicks FULL STOP.

which is more than you can say about bridge or sylvinho