Spurs thread 2019/20

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cheers Jim, personally, I don't have a problem with that at all, people will say as a footballer, he's a role model etc etc, and should set an example, but for me, fundamentally, he's a human being, which brings it's own responsibilities, one of which being you protect and stand by your family, ergo he may not have acted correctly as a footballer, but he has as a decent human being in my book.

Agreed.

He'll probably get a ban. And maybe that's fair enough. The FA can't allow the precedent to be set, no matter the justification.

But it's nothing like the Cantona incident. So up to 5 games would be about right.
 
Agreed.

He'll probably get a ban. And maybe that's fair enough. The FA can't allow the precedent to be set, no matter the justification.

But it's nothing like the Cantona incident. So up to 5 games would be about right
.

Probably mate, but an awkward sod like me would probably go to the European court of human rights to dispute it, think his rights under that would trump FA rules, not sure if there's an actual offence under traditional law that says a footballer can't go into the crowd ?
 
Probably mate, but an awkward sod like me would probably go to the European court of human rights to dispute it, think his rights under that would trump FA rules, not sure if there's an actual offence under traditional law that says a footballer can't go into the crowd ?

Well, if you wouldn't mind doing that on Eric's behalf, he and Spurs would be most grateful. Free pint of Neck Oil and a sausage roll on your next visit. Plus a £4.99 voucher for the club shop, redeemable when you spend over £60.
 
We don't know what the abuse was, what Dier's brother said in return, or who kicked off the aggro first.

There's nothing wrong with Dier's brother objecting to abuse, depending on how he did so. And, if the "fan" was the one to attack his brother, Dier was justified in coming to his brother's defence. In fact, that constitutes self defence.

But, as I say, we don't know exactly what was said or done or how it all unfolded. So best to hang fire until the facts are established.
They have their standards in hospitality at Tottenham, but won't raise them for anybody. Moral of the story: stay with the plebs - it's safer!
 
We don't know what the abuse was, what Dier's brother said in return, or who kicked off the aggro first.

There's nothing wrong with Dier's brother objecting to abuse, depending on how he did so. And, if the "fan" was the one to attack his brother, Dier was justified in coming to his brother's defence. In fact, that constitutes self defence.

But, as I say, we don't know exactly what was said or done or how it all unfolded. So best to hang fire until the facts are established.

There is no and never will be justification for a player diving into the crowd for a scrap mate.
 
We don't know what the abuse was, what Dier's brother said in return, or who kicked off the aggro first.

There's nothing wrong with Dier's brother objecting to abuse, depending on how he did so. And, if the "fan" was the one to attack his brother, Dier was justified in coming to his brother's defence. In fact, that constitutes self defence.

But, as I say, we don't know exactly what was said or done or how it all unfolded. So best to hang fire until the facts are established.
Absolutely no chance of Dier acting in "self defence" if he is attacking a single fan having an altercation with his brother. As soon as he gets involved it means it is 2(brothers) vs 1 and that is not self defence. If he went to the aid of his brother in a street brawl and ended up punching the other guy,he would be arrested and up before the beak quicker than you could say "Spurs are gonna win fu*k all again this year".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.