The only thing that I am guilty of is expressing opinions with which you disagree. That is not the definition of a WUM.
Nothing that I post is gratuitous. It is only ever in response to posts from others on here. I never slag off City. I don't brag about Spurs (even on the rare occasions that I do have something to brag about!). I do defend my club when I believe that it is warranted or when, at the very least, there is a second side to the story that is worthy of consideration. But I am always calm and polite when doing so. Again, that is not the definition of a WUM. Quite the opposite, in fact.
What's really happening, I think, is that you cannot help but be wound up by anything relating to Spurs, regardless of whether anything has been written that is even remotely controversial. Your hatred of Spurs is so deep - and the wound so open - that you appear to be triggered by mere mention of the club.
I refer you to my comments to Karen above. If my posts really contributed as little of worth to the conversation and were as deliberately provocative as you claim them to be, I have little doubt that the mods would have banned me long ago. But I have been posting here, on and off, for some ten years now without so much as even a warning. And I think it is because the mods, at least, can see that I am not what you and Karen claim me to be.