I didn't dismiss the bulk of Spurs' debt as "standard debt that all clubs have". That's merely your misreading of my post. I had already specifically discussed the stadium and COVID loans.
Do I really need to provide links to my figures, as if my post was some sort of PhD paper? The figures are taken from Spurs' own finance announcements, along with Bank of America.
Once again, the stadium debt is costing Spurs c. £16m per annum. The recent £250m private placement (that allowed the club to repay the Bank of England CCFF loan) is costing the club a further £7m per annum.
The other "debt" consists of future instalments on player purchases and amounts falling due within one year - current liabilities - such as payroll, taxes, accrued expenses, and accounts payable. It also includes unearned revenue: an accounting technicality that records services yet to be provided as a debt - in this instance, football clubs owing season ticket holders the cost of however many matches have yet to be fulfilled.
All of this other "debt" is common to every other football club and none of it is subject to interest charges. So I repeat, contrary to your claim, Spurs' total interest payable per annum is less than £25m.
Of course I cannot absolutely rule out the possibility that Spurs are concealing the fact that they are facing imminent financial collapse but, as of now, there is no evidence to suggest that that is the case. The debt is all long term and low interest. And while it is quite valid to cite past instances of companies claiming financial stability before crashing, the number of such cases pales into insignificance by comparison to the number of companies that claim to be stable and are, in fact....................exactly that.
So unless you can furnish the discussion with any evidence beyond the simplistic "Spurs are up to their eyeballs in debt", your argument will remain nothing more than wishful thinking.