persvenality cult
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 2,855
BWFC tid said:BlueSinclair said:Whyyy do we care what people like that predict? It doesn't mean a god damn thing. This may sound harsh but grow up and don't take any notice. They have a right to their opinion, and I don't think we'll make top 4 either.
You may be right, Mancini has always been a defensive minded manager, and City may play a whole season of one nils and draws, but one thing he will guarantee is stability.
The problem is, all you lot and the owners in Arab-land, you all want instant success, and it aint gonna happen, because Chelsea, Man U and Arsenal have well established squads and players who have been together for years, and they will beat you home and away. You have to wake up get real, or you'll be without a manager by xmas. You guys will be the downfall of this team by creating pressure where patience is needed.
:)
A season of 1-0's. Not a chance, not a chance if last year is anything to go by. I don't think we had one 1-0 under Mancini! Not that I'd complain, but there's a hell of a goal threat in this team.
He hasn't always been a defensively minded manager. It's just a rep that's got out of hand since he arrived in the UK. The Italians repeatedly criticised him for concentrating on attack, from his first job with Fiorentina, until one day at Inter he decided the only way he could guarantee winning the Scudetto for was by turning 2-2s into 1-0's. Still, he was not nearly as defensively minded as Mourinho was at Chelsea, that's for sure.
I certainly agree about Chelsea and Utd having the advantage of shared experience of winning together. But it's wrong to think we all demand instant success. Most are just filled with hope and optimism. That's something else entirely. What happens when that hope is tested? We'll see.
And I hope, I pray to god that, as they stuck with Hughes throughout a horrific patch in his first 6 months, they will show Mancini, their guy, every bit as much support, if not a lot more. I think the flak they took went down very badly. They won't invite it upon themselves again without a seriously good reason. Having said that, the desire for 'instant success' is real, but it's based in the pressure of the impending Financial Fair Play rules, rather than any inherent impatience on their part. Anyway, don't pretend to know what their bottom line is.
It's a bit of a misconception to think Hughes was sacked because of the results. Admittedly, one they fostered by talking of the 'trajectory', but at the same time the message was sent out, it was the direction of the club that concerned them, and Hughes' refusal to publicly accept a new target of 4th. City realised Liverpool were in big trouble, and wanted to pile the pressure on as quickly as possible, but Hughes was seemingly not willing to take that on himself. Added to which, he had a blueprint in mind (premiership proven class to bring instant results) that, together with his tactical ability, and his responsibility with the money (RSC & Lescott having been bought for 40m despite serious, ongoing fitness problems) they no-longer believed in. And whilst I can't prove it, I think a major factor was that there was a struggle going on behind the scenes over certain issues, Hughes was digging in deeper, putting himself at odds with other figures at the club, and it was in danger of getting out of hand.
Good luck at Bolton. You used to be so easy to hate. Owen Coyle has ruined everything.