Stadium Developments thread

City's owners spend their own money developing a world class team, world class facilities and re generating an area that sorely needs it. Result = 115 charges

The Rags owners screw the club into the ground (granted thats been a positive), cream off the cash they can, burdon the club with massive debt, use public money to rebuild the stadium. Result = Media wank fest
 
Lord Coe the fucking twat who made a complete bollocks of allocating the 2012 Olympic Games tickets. He gave hundreds of thousands to countries who couldn't sell them so they ended up in expensice package deals.

Coe and Gordon Brown are the two people I despise the most.
 
City's owners spend their own money developing a world class team, world class facilities and re generating an area that sorely needs it. Result = 115 charges

The Rags owners screw the club into the ground (granted thats been a positive), cream off the cash they can, burdon the club with massive debt, use public money to rebuild the stadium. Result = Media wank fest
In what world is this right?
 
Stockport looking to increase Edgeley Park up to 18.000 from just over 10,000.
 
????? Don't get it. What is being said here?

Just an example showing that some developments are, or partially are, just covers rather than totally new constructions.

The newer stands at United for example still have a lot of old workings underneath which is one reason why they want to develop a new stadium - there’s only so much you can polish a turd after all. Anfield will be in the same position in 20 years time.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.