No. It would be stupid to shoehorn a scene where he literally has the plans in his grasp and for whatever reason does not use the force to grab them after literally showing the audience that he can just do that!
You can't have it both ways. You can't justify his lightsaber wielding "badass-ery" saying he is angry and desperate to get the plans, and then excuse him for not actually doing it when he has the chance. They're literally right there! Why go on a rampage and then not actually secure them? That's why the scene is so disjointed.
There could have been a myriad of ways of having a Vader cameo at the end of Rogue One to segue into a New Hope. Having the scene that they chose completely betrays the tone set at the start of a New Hope, and moreover is completely flawed from a basic storytelling premise as it doesn't add up.
They’re either just out of reach or he’s dealing with lasers being fired at him when they’re in reach, I feel you’re nitpicking.
Tbf he rampages a lot in Rebels destroying ships and fighters, and anything in his path.
As for the plans he is busy killing rebel fighters at the time who are shooting at him, he is hardly gonna be just stood there using the force to get them while being shot at.
It as decent an ending as you could get that didn't change the link to the next film as the plans ended up where they needed to be with leia
In my opinion.
His head bum annoyed, disgusted and intrigued me all at the same time.He died in TLJ apparently (jar jar) haven't you heard the latest fan theory that Snoke is Jar Jar who originaly a sith lord
Ye sorry mate it was in answer to another posterI was reply to someone saying Rogue 1 final scene goes immediately into New Hope opening scene. Which it doesn't.
Why didn't he force grab the plans from the guys hand? He does it to their guns (in fact force grabs a heap of guns), why is holding plans any different?
Lazy storytelling, thats why. Due to shoehorning in a scene purely for fan service.
No. It would be stupid to shoehorn a scene where he literally has the plans in his grasp and for whatever reason does not use the force to grab them after literally showing the audience that he can just do that!
You can't have it both ways. You can't justify his lightsaber wielding "badass-ery" saying he is angry and desperate to get the plans, and then excuse him for not actually doing it when he has the chance. They're literally right there! Why go on a rampage and then not actually secure them? That's why the scene is so disjointed.
There could have been a myriad of ways of having a Vader cameo at the end of Rogue One to segue into a New Hope. Having the scene that they chose completely betrays the tone set at the start of a New Hope, and moreover is completely flawed from a basic storytelling premise as it doesn't add up.
So the book of art for TLJ has revealed the main plot of luke/rey and the idea of tge jedi temple amongst otger things are all from Lucas original idea for episode 7 before he sold the rights to disney and JJ binned his vision.
Looks like Johnson revisited Lucas vision and used some of it, wouldn't this make TLJ more of a star wars film than people are giving it credit.
In the EU Luke had a son Ben, Han and Leia had Jacen and Jaina, Jacen turned to the dark side.Not quite.
Lucas' theory for Episode VII was highly influenced by the Expanded Universe, in which Luke also set up a new Jedi Order/Temple. I can't quite remember who specifically, but another relation to Luke also turned to the Sith in this story; it was a Solo, if memory serves me correct. So, yeah, in that regard, the two plot lines are rather similar. What people have a problem about, however, is that in Lucas' and the Expanded Universe, Luke at now point betrayed his entire character arc and attempted to murder this relation who had turned.
In the EU Luke had a son Ben, Han and Leia had Jacen and Jaina, Jacen turned to the dark side.
His sister. There was also Anakin Solo.AKA Darth Caedus I think and he was killed by a family member (twin or nephew cannot remember)