Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 15,227
99m?
Sounds like a good deal
99m?
Didn't know thatYou do know that Kia joorabchian is the agent of Mahrez? Maybe not chucked out lol.
I thought he had switched to an agency called Sport Invest last Christmas. That's what Google says anyway. I know that City severed links with Joorabchian and stopped dealing with him before Pep came in.You do know that Kia joorabchian is the agent of Mahrez? Maybe not chucked out lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kia_Joorabchian#Sports_Invest_UK_LimitedDidn't know that
I thought he had switched to an agency called Sport Invest last Christmas. That's what Google says anyway. I know that City severed links with Joorabchian and stopped dealing with him before Pep came in.
Didn't know that
I thought he had switched to an agency called Sport Invest last Christmas. That's what Google says anyway. I know that City severed links with Joorabchian and stopped dealing with him before Pep came in.
Well his agent Aidy ward is a greedy bastard so I’m really not sure if there will be a possible solution sorted? Mullock is normally well in the loop and it sounds like raheems camp are set on what they want and we won’t entertain it. It’s a tough one as obviously Raheem is an important young and improving member of the squad, but I also understand the clubs point of view regarding current players wanting upgraded contracts and new arrivals wanting bigger money if Raheem gets £300,000 a week! First time I’ve actually thought there is a strong chance of him going :-(
I expect it's just posturing from both sides. The new era of incentive based rewards is a very sensible approach but maybe that negatively impacts agents' commissions?
It probably is but I believe the club will feel he needs them more than they do him
I agree in that I do believe the club will already know his intentions. My feeling is that he wants to stay but he/his agent are asking for more than the club is willing to offer and that any compromise will be from the Sterling campI'm sure Pep must have spoken to Raz directly and been able to tell whether he genuinely wants to stay and I also think Pere must be plugged into the chatter on the agent network.
I think like most footballers he'd deal comfortably with the brain dead racism that he'd receive on occasion abroad. I'm talking the occasional monkey noise which is sadly common. I don't think that overly affects players.
It's more the systemic racism he receives here
from the press. Certain publications seems determined to bring him down based on little more than him being young, black, rich & determind. I imagine that is what gets him down. I don't see a Spanish paper being arsed about him buying his mum a house or having a Greggs.
I think he'll resign though.
You're at it again with your 5 brain cell comments. Why don't you try talking to people civilly, and perhaps your comments might not be taken apart when you are found lacking in the basic comprehension of our sports and language?Championship-winning team. Easy enough to know that that was what I was trying to say for anyone with more than 5 brain cells.
You're at it again with your 5 brain cell comments. You're a feking bellend. Rag prick.
He's not in the same bracket as KDB or Sergio by some way so he shouldn't be on the same money.
1) He's not worth pissing off Sergio and KDB to retain him
2) He's highly replaceable.
3) He's being extremely greedy
I wonder if the Mahrez signing was with a view to the club knowing that Sterling has ambitions to leave and play for Real Madrid?
Like itWhilst the catalyst for the media onslaught was unquestionably Sterling daring to leave the dippers, and in the process delivering them (the media) a golden opportunity to harvest clicks galore, there is no way that from then on in racism hasn’t been an underlying motivation. The 4 papers that have consistently pilloried Sterling the most have been the Fail, the Sun, the Star and the Express, all of them right wing publications, all of them ever ready to play up to the prejudices of their demented readerships.
Every story in the Fail in particular comes with a comments section, and every story is designed to enrage Tory voters in the Shires to the point that they log on and start venting their bile. It has “go to” scapegoats too numerous to mention. Lily Allen and Gary Lineker both dared to speak out against conditions in the migrant camps in Northern France. Both are served up as tax dodging, luvvies on a near daily basis. There is always a non-story about “breastfeeding in public places” to undermine women’s rights, there is always a “single mums most likely to die of cancer” scare story designed to promote the idylls of marriage, and you would have to be blind not to see its agenda on Brexit, with 20 stories a day referring to “remoaners”, “traitors” (judges), and “the will of the people.”
I am constantly amazed then that people would imagine that papers would necessarily limit their prejudices to the front pages only, as if promulgating them on the sport’s pages would be to cross some imaginary line of morality. Raheem Sterling is a young, successful black man, of Jamaican descent, everything readers of the Fail would instinctively fear and loathe, and if you want a recent example of its race-related bias, it was the double page “a tattoo-free hero England can be proud of” pile of bullshit it served up as an homage to St Harry of Kaneshire when the manufactured “Sterling gun tattoo” outrage was at its zenith