Incredibly, The Times' Manchester correspondent went as far as to describe it as "a great deal" for the club.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sterling’s contract - three year extension confirmed
- Thread starter Essex blue
- Start date
Incredibly, The Times' Manchester correspondent went as far as to describe it as "a great deal" for the club.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
That went completely over my head lol,i'm going to take a guess and say yesI see the Google AI team has implemented a few improvements to the ‘adaptive recursive social engagement’ bots over the last few weeks. Their productivity has shot up substantially across multiple threads.
@Henkeman Have you been tracking their activity?
@karen7 If you were to rate their efficiency on a scale of 1 to 10, where would you put them?
I am completing a survey for Ric to see if this beta phase is worth an investment in to a full roll out. ;-)
Moving on to the topic on hand, would you agree that you'd like to see him being pushed towards signing a new deal either way (to avoid a potential Bosman scenario) or do you lean towards those who argue that it's his right to look out for his best interests and look for a signing-on fee with his next club, and as such aren't really that bothered with the fact that he hasn't signed yet?
Last edited by a moderator:
Incredibly, The Times' Manchester correspondent went as far as to describe it as "a great deal" for the club.
That's just silly. I understand that club correspondents tend to show some bias in favor of the club's they're covering but this is just insultingly silly. Then again, there is a young reporter with connections to Mourinho (Duncan Castles) who acts as though he were a fan typing in an unmoderated forum, rather than a reporter.
The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 8,748
Incredibly, The Times' Manchester correspondent went as far as to describe it as "a great deal" for the club.
That's like something Trump would tweet, Great deal, what a load of bollocks.
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,866
Lol, that's my point , you don't offer an opinion you just question or belittle others opinions!I have offered opinion, but if you dont like it, use the ignore button
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
He should always look out for himself, short careers etc, but he can do that by signing a new contract i.e. He doesn't have to leave to get what he wantsMoving on to the topic on hand, would you agree that you'd like to see him being pushed towards signing a new deal either way (to avoid a potential Bosman scenario) or do you lean towards those who argue that it's his right to look out for his best interests and look for a signing-on fee with his next club, and as such aren't really that bothered with the fact that he hasn't signed yet?
SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
That’s alright, it’s a reference to another comment I made in another thread, so it’s tenuous at best.That went completely over my head lol,i'm going to take a guess and say yes
I am just trying to bring levity to the proceedings.
After all, Raheem’s contract situation is not a life or death situation, no matter what the Daily Mail may say. ;-)
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
Incredibly, The Times' Manchester correspondent went as far as to describe it as "a great deal" for the club.
Thing is, he had eight months left on his contract, so United were backed into a corner.
Shows what a dicey game it is running down contracts.
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
That's just silly. I understand that club correspondents tend to show some bias in favor of the club's they're covering but this is just insultingly silly. Then again, there is a young reporter with connections to Mourinho (Duncan Castles) who acts as though he were a fan typing in an unmoderated forum, rather than a reporter.
Young?
He's closer to 50 than 20.