I'm not arguing they aren't penalties. What i am saying, is there have been a few more incidents today and are being totally ignored.
I don't call that a clampdown, by referees. So instead of trying to belittle people with the painful and hard to understand remarks,
maybe you should read what people post.
If there is indeed a new directive? So far the evidence would point to only the Sky presenter and Mike Dean being informed.I have read what people have said and if you look back ive completely agreed the matter of it being applied consistently is a fair argument, but that still does not make it not a penalty.
People are stating its not a penalty under the new directive, which is ridiculous.
Nothing to explain really but I'll have a go.Perhaps if you explained the logic behind your ascertations you could persuade your doubters?
What was it the booing of Sterling? Is it because of his England performances? Can't think it could be anything else.Middle aged Stokie fan getting home: Hello mum it was good at the match today
Mum: Oh good, did they win?
Stokie: Oh no but we got to boo Sterling loads of times. It were great, mum.
Mum: Oh good I am glad you enjoyed yourself. Have you met a nice girl yet?
What sort of pricks boo all the time like they did? Grown men who seemed to be holding the breath ready and hoping the ball would go to Sterling just so they could boo, the highlight of their match.
If there is indeed a new directive? So far the evidence would point to only the Sky presenter and Mike Dean being informed.
Don't you believe in fairness and the integrity of a competition whereby the rule are consistently applied, and by the way do not insult me and imply I am thick, just because I have the effrontery to challenge your post.Nothing to explain really but I'll have a go.
I thought the penalty was bullshit, and couldn't believe it was given. However, the Sky pundits explained that the refs had told everyone that if they don't watch the ball and just simply impede an opposition player, then it would be a penalty. So, OK, Sterling done exactly that so its a penalty.
HoweverBluemoon have two arguments:
1. Sky are lying and making it up.
2. Also, it won't be given at Old Trafford so it's not fair.
If point 1 is right, then I'd imagine the Refs Union will tell us. Point 2 is utter shite.
I don't think he'd have scored the goals that Nolito did.
I have read what people have said and if you look back ive completely agreed the matter of it being applied consistently is a fair argument, but that still does not make it not a penalty.
People are stating its not a penalty under the new directive, which is ridiculous.
Just got back from the game. It's weird, i actually thought we were fairly poor today yet we've just won 4-1 away from home against Stoke. What a team, what a manager.
Jesus H fucking Christ.Don't you believe in fairness and the integrity of a competition whereby the rule are consistently applied, and by the way do not insult me and imply I am thick, just because I have the effrontery to challenge your post.
Dont say that mate. Niall Quinn has said similar and he is a **** who hates us apparently.
Oh aye. Not arguing.
Jesus H fucking Christ.
Fairness? Integrity? What the fuck has that got to do with it? Those wankers in Trafford cleaned up trophies by the dozen by cheating and intimidating refs. That dirty fucking whisky nosed **** Ferguson used every dirty underhand trick in the book to make sure opposing British managers rolled over for him and his dirty fucking rag hordes. We all knew it went on, the media knew it went on and the fucking refs knew it went on. Fairness and integrity went out the window years ago. Don't try and build an argument in fairness and integrity, they're part of a bygone era.
Whilst I totally agree with you resume of the blue nosed era,I do not think your comments about my body being thick are appropriate. I have always lived by a rule, do not type something you would not say to them face to face. You should adopt the same, or are you a keyboard coward!Jesus H fucking Christ.
Fairness? Integrity? What the fuck has that got to do with it? Those wankers in Trafford cleaned up trophies by the dozen by cheating and intimidating refs. That dirty fucking whisky nosed **** Ferguson used every dirty underhand trick in the book to make sure opposing British managers rolled over for him and his dirty fucking rag hordes. We all knew it went on, the media knew it went on and the fucking refs knew it went on. Fairness and integrity went out the window years ago. Don't try and build an argument in fairness and integrity, they're part of a bygone era.
The word poor, is a bit harsh. Poor is what we were at Stoke last season.
The pundits reckon the score line flattered us. Quinn and Souness said we gave the ball away cheaply. However, 4-1 at Stoke while not being at your best ain't bad. Also, and the media aren't making enough of this, we have Sane and Gundogan to come in, and probably a new keeper........and possibly Kompany!Just got back from the game. It's weird, i actually thought we were fairly poor today yet we've just won 4-1 away from home against Stoke. What a team, what a manager.
He said 'fairly' though. Is he a rag/****/biased sky reporter or simply a biased rag, sky reporting ****?
Maybe Ninja Monkey is Niall Quinn?