jollylescott said:
The second half last night showed that we are starting to grind towards top gear. Much of that depends upon Kun, and how Bony quickly Bony integrates into the team. If we can keep them both fit and healthy we are going to inflict a lot of damage on other teams towards the end of the season. Whether we can catch Chelsea relies upon their results. We just need to take care of our own business starting with Newcastle.
The beauty of the game last night is that it will have restored the confidence of the squad. We had been playing without confidence, and for me the turning point was the return to top form of the mighty Kun.
Kudos also to Merlin, Nasri and Milner. They fought hard and with pride last night, and it was wonderful to watch.
And for those on this forum that were predicting a loss last night, you always have to remind yourself that this City team is at it's best when it's back is to the wall.
Only two teams in the history of the league have won back to back titles. That shows how hard the task really is. So if we don't catch Chelsea, and finish second, it will still be an honourable achievement.
The old first division was far more open than the Premiership has ever been, historically more clubs competed for the title and so more clubs won it and defended it. Clubs would get together a good side, have a purple patch for two or three seasons, then drift away again, that has never happened in the Premiership. In the Premiership era the only club who have really dominated the league are Man U and that's why they're one if only two to defend it and the only team that has defended it consistently. The only other club who, over the last 20 seasons, has consistently challenged for the top four is Arsenal.
Agree with your main points, but for those of us whose memory isn't receding as fast as our hairlines, that is just patently not true. It has been done by many clubs before the lauded 'Premiership' came into being, and even since then, the other lot have won it back-to-back four times. It's difficult, granted, but not as much as the media might suggest.