Danamy said:
Out................if we get the chance to sign a better manager!
In..................if nobody better is available
Afterall isn't that the way you run any buisness?.......if you get the chance to improve or get better you take it?
(Only my opinion)
Are you seriously suggesting that you are unsure as to whether the richest club in the world, in possession of some wonderful players, a good stadium, wonderful owners and a high profile, might not be able to attract a manager that is better than Mark Hughes?
Given that there is nothing at all - absolutely nothing - to suggest that Hughes is anywhere near the top tier of world football managers, then I would suggest that it is a 100% certainty that, whenever the job became availble, we would be able to attract at least one better manager. That doesn't mean that they would definitely appoint a better manager - but there is no doubt at all that Mark Hughes is not the pinnicle of managers who would be interested in managing this club under current circumstances. In fact, I'd suggest, based on recent and past acheivements, he'd be well down in the pack.
Oh yeah, out, for me.
18 months of constant underacheivement, with the only running theme of his tenure being taking players and making them produce performances that are generally way below the sum of their parts. Still not seen an argument that disputes or reputes this fact - just a load of cliches and people, possibly correctly, assuming that any old manager could throw 200m at a team and eventually get it right. They are probably correct about that, but why settle for someone whose only constant during his time here has been underacheivement.
(well, there's long ball , that's been pretty regular and constant too. Oh, and constant blame shifting. Oh, and constantly being unable to establish working relationships with players or staff he hasn't appointed personally. Yeah, but apart from all those running themes, the only constant has been making teams play way below the sum of their parts)
