Sturridge - Chelsea

citoeast

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 Nov 2008
Messages
989
http://www.people.co.uk/sport/footb...objectid=21237014&siteid=93463-name_page.html

If the above People story is true, who else feels this is a terrible shame, to lose such a promising young player.

I feel this is one player we could regret losing, but I do not know who to blame. Academy players are ones we should seek to keep. I heard MH was not keen on him, which if true is a shame. Some feel he is being too greedy, whatever is true Chelsea must be prepared to meet his wage demands if this story is true.

Certainly there is no way in my mind that he deserves to be paid £50k/week and I would be amazed if even mega spending Chelsea had offered him this. I do not believe this wage claim I think it is grossly exaggerated, £20k would be a big wage for such a young, premiership unproven player; albeit very promising.

Yes I know we have been around the block a few times on Sturridge threads, but I am still interested in what others feel on Danny possibly leaving.
 
citoeast said:
http://www.people.co.uk/sport/footb...objectid=21237014&siteid=93463-name_page.html

If the above People story is true, who else feels this is a terrible shame, to lose such a promising young player.

I feel this is one player we could regret losing, but I do not know who to blame. Academy players are ones we should seek to keep. I heard MH was not keen on him, which if true is a shame. Some feel he is being too greedy, whatever is true Chelsea must be prepared to meet his wage demands if this story is true.

Certainly there is no way in my mind that he deserves to be paid £50k/week and I would be amazed if even mega spending Chelsea had offered him this. I do not believe this wage claim I think it is grossly exaggerated, £20k would be a big wage for such a young, premiership unproven player; albeit very promising.

Yes I know we have been around the block a few times on Sturridge threads, but I am still interested in what others feel on Danny possibly leaving.

It could happen but the article is by Alan Nixon - clueless.
 
citoeast said:
http://www.people.co.uk/sport/footb...objectid=21237014&siteid=93463-name_page.html

If the above People story is true, who else feels this is a terrible shame, to lose such a promising young player.

I feel this is one player we could regret losing, but I do not know who to blame. Academy players are ones we should seek to keep. I heard MH was not keen on him, which if true is a shame. Some feel he is being too greedy, whatever is true Chelsea must be prepared to meet his wage demands if this story is true.

Certainly there is no way in my mind that he deserves to be paid £50k/week and I would be amazed if even mega spending Chelsea had offered him this. I do not believe this wage claim I think it is grossly exaggerated, £20k would be a big wage for such a young, premiership unproven player; albeit very promising.

Yes I know we have been around the block a few times on Sturridge threads, but I am still interested in what others feel on Danny possibly leaving.

Would be absolutely gutted as i have always said he will be a star. I think he could be a surprise inclusion in the world cup squad too if he plays games next season. Hope it is with us, but Chelsea have been desperate for years to get hold of him. Why oh why is he out of contrct. Just read this article, a view saying he should quit.

In life, as in the work place, one has to stand up for oneself and avoid situations which could see you being “walked all over” by companies, bosses, or colleagues, if you are to make a success of your career.

Daniel Sturridge is a bright young prospect who graduated to Manchester City’s main office in 2006 and has since proven to be one of England’s brightest young stars. His performances have been made even more impressive considering the form of players such as Stephen Ireland and Robinho.

For the 19-year-old forward to be upstaging such famous names is surely a sign of what is to come.

There is no doubt in my mind that if Manchester City hadn’t been bought over this summer, Sturridge would be a first team regular, probably in place of Brazilian superstar Robinho.

Unfortunately, as with any business, new owners means restructuring, new goals, and new ideas.

Or in the case of Manchester City, much more money and redecorating.

We have already established that Daniel had an encouraging start to this season and impressed many with his flair, confidence, and ability over the first half of the season, but where was his reward at promotion time?

Sturridge must have been sure his performances would be enough for more time on the pitch and a bumper new contract, seeing as his deal with the company expires in the summer. In essence, the former England youth international was looking for a promotion.

Did he get that promotion?

No, he did not. He was overlooked for promotion as the club brought in Craig Bellamy, a player so loyal he has scored for six Premier League clubs.

A bitter blow for a young man in any situation, never mind a player with the world at his feet.

Had I been in that situation, I may have been very tempted to run down my contract and leave at the end of the season, and this is what I believe Sturridge should do.

You see, come the end of the season, Manchester City will sign someone else, then someone else, and so on.

Sturridge however (all credit to him) opened contract talks with City over a new deal, only to be told he was asking for far too much money. Yip, sounds like life to me. Players such as Craig “I’ll be here for a season” Bellamy can hold “his” club to ransom, but they will do “their own” no favours.

Manchester City boss Mark Hughes has criticised Sturridge’s money hungry advisors for his supposed wage demands of £65,000 a week, but we didn’t hear him criticising his club's relentless chase for Kaka when any possible deal would have been based on money, not a desire to play for the club.

I personally think Sturridge is getting a raw deal at City and he would be far better off under, say, Martin O’Neill at Aston Villa. However, any move to Villa—and remember, he is a Birmingham native—would mean running down his contract.

And if I had the choice between sitting on the bench next season or playing UEFA Champions League football with possibly England’s most exciting side, it would be a pretty easy choice to make.

No wonder he wants a bumper pay deal to stay at City.

Sturridge is simply standing up to be counted and refusing to be walked all over. In life we call such people, “winners."
 
He is a greedy bugger - When he was a kid it was always about money

Dont want to lose him but not sure about him me- Looks good as a sub, not so good when he has started apart from schalke away
 
37680434566970 said:
He is a greedy bugger - When he was a kid it was always about money

Dont want to lose him but not sure about him me- Looks good as a sub, not so good when he has started apart from schalke away

never about the money for him, he just wants 1st team football

really poor article that is, why would e go to chelski when they wouldnt get as much money as here and would be buried more than here
 
No fee at the end of the season so somebody will give him an inflated weekly pay packet. If the fifty or seventy-five is to be believed, as he ever produced such quality and consistency, and has he always been available. Seems to get more than his fair share of knocks. Was pretty fantastic at U18 level but I suspect he will be one who finds himself in a bigger pond as he grows older with similarly aged players overtaking him in the context of starts in the Premier League.
 
for a long time the prospect of sturridge leaving made me angry. I think he has the skills neccesary to be a success at any level, and he always excites me.
I dont know why his contract wasnt sorted out last year, we inadvertantly put him in a strong bargaining position.

truth is tho, you have to ask if he is worth anything like 50k a week, given that he's hardly played this year or last.
he has landed himself with a 'too-big-for-his-boots' reputation, on the back of a handful of appearances. his injury record is frustrating, and i wonder how good a trainer he is given that he hasnt broken into the first team, how committed he is to this club? I don't know. The management do. if he's not committed to the club, it might be a good idea to let him go.

if someone else benefits, so be it. we have to do what is right for our club, which means only rewarding those who are committed, and are performing. for too long the opposite has been true, we have made fools of ourselves in the transfer market, given juicy contracts to has-beens, flawed talents, journeymen, and most annoyingly, talented youngsters who then go backwards. bellamy has got a huge contract, it's true, but he has delivered since day one. that's the way ahead, no more second best, no more flash in the pans, no more laziness. all the money in the world won't help us if we don't understand the concept of value.
 
It is up to the lad himself, no doubt we have offered him a contract, he knows strikers will leave in te summer and maybe new ones will arrive. He can leave and try and secure first team football elsewhere or he can fight for his place at city. The lad obviously thinks he is better off away from city.
 
We will get paid even if his contract is up, but some will go to Coventry. The valuations are hit and miss though, we would probably only get about £2M if lucky.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.