Suarez - banned for 4 months (page 74)

[BlueNod864]

A good wc, and after England match it looked that way, and Liverpool would have been in a position of either having a flying Suarez for the start of the season or £50m plus to strengthen the squad.
They will defo have neither now and if I was fifa I would ban him for an extra 2 months for not accepting responsibilty for his, obvious, actions.

 

[Tbilisi]

If he bottled someone on his holidays and got put in jail for 4 months, would the dippers be claiming he should be let out on Saturdays to play for them, as to not punish Liverpool? I find it bizarre that people think he shouldn't miss Liverpool games

One of your examples happened on a football field and one didnt.Think its harsh as I have said on Liverpool but not complaining re our first home game.

Just a shame he didnt bite Rooney the poisonous twat.

 

[Wretched Vengeance]

Suarez, must be feeling really proud right about now.

 

[FanchesterCity]

A good wc, and after England match it looked that way, and Liverpool would have been in a position of either having a flying Suarez for the start of the season or £50m plus to strengthen the squad.
They will defo have neither now and if I was fifa I would ban him for an extra 2 months for not accepting responsibilty for his, obvious, actions.

In his defence, and it's only 'just' in his defence, there's a whole new debate to be had about his bad is his bite, vs (say) Fellaini's elbow on Zab at United which went unpunished?

For some reason, we're all conditioned to treat a bite (or spitting as absolutely shocking, but had Suarez just head butted, or elbowed someone, he's most likely get a red card, and that's it. I'n not 100% comfortable with that. People are saying elbows are 'part of the game' but I'm not having it.

 

[tidyman]

Dalglish was dropping hints in his Daily Mirror column this morning that Liverpool are not interested in selling him.

Although he was also, rather bizarrely comparing his state of mind to a leg injury.

 

[Tbilisi]

A good wc, and after England match it looked that way, and Liverpool would have been in a position of either having a flying Suarez for the start of the season or £50m plus to strengthen the squad.
They will defo have neither now and if I was fifa I would ban him for an extra 2 months for not accepting responsibilty for his, obvious, actions.

In his defence, and it's only 'just' in his defence, there's a whole new debate to be had about his bad is his bite, vs (say) Fellaini's elbow on Zab at United which went unpunished?

For some reason, we're all conditioned to treat a bite (or spitting as absolutely shocking, but had Suarez just head butted, or elbowed someone, he's most likely get a red card, and that's it. I'n not 100% comfortable with that. People are saying elbows are 'part of the game' but I'm not having it.

Thats a great point,all a form of assault.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

A good wc, and after England match it looked that way, and Liverpool would have been in a position of either having a flying Suarez for the start of the season or £50m plus to strengthen the squad.
They will defo have neither now and if I was fifa I would ban him for an extra 2 months for not accepting responsibilty for his, obvious, actions.

In his defence, and it's only 'just' in his defence, there's a whole new debate to be had about his bad is his bite, vs (say) Fellaini's elbow on Zab at United which went unpunished?

For some reason, we're all conditioned to treat a bite (or spitting as absolutely shocking, but had Suarez just head butted, or elbowed someone, he's most likely get a red card, and that's it. I'n not 100% comfortable with that. People are saying elbows are 'part of the game' but I'm not having it.

I agree with your moral evaluation. There's worse things than spitting and this sort of biting imo.

 

[FanchesterCity]

If he bottled someone on his holidays and got put in jail for 4 months, would the dippers be claiming he should be let out on Saturdays to play for them, as to not punish Liverpool? I find it bizarre that people think he shouldn't miss Liverpool games

One of your examples happened on a football field and one didnt.Think its harsh as I have said on Liverpool but not complaining re our first home game.

Just a shame he didnt bite Rooney the poisonous twat.

A better example:

You hire a driver for your firm.
At weekends, he does some taxi work, and get done for drink driving, and gets a ban.
He wasn't working for you at the time, but for another company. Can you reasonably expect him to be able to drive for you?

I can understand Liverpool not being happy, but they should sue Suarez in that case. He's the one that's caused this issue for them.

 

[Tbilisi]

If he bottled someone on his holidays and got put in jail for 4 months, would the dippers be claiming he should be let out on Saturdays to play for them, as to not punish Liverpool? I find it bizarre that people think he shouldn't miss Liverpool games

One of your examples happened on a football field and one didnt.Think its harsh as I have said on Liverpool but not complaining re our first home game.

Just a shame he didnt bite Rooney the poisonous twat.

A better example:

You hire a driver for your firm.
At weekends, he does some taxi work, and get done for drink driving, and gets a ban.
He wasn't working for you at the time, but for another company. Can you reasonably expect him to be able to drive for you?

I can understand Liverpool not being happy, but they should sue Suarez in that case. He's the one that's caused this issue for them.

In a work situation he would be part of a disciplinary procedure and would be exited from the company as he was unable to do his job.So no I would not expect a driver to continue working as it would be against the law.

They are not an asset valued at 60 Million so different rules apply as is the norm in football.

 

[FanchesterCity]

One of your examples happened on a football field and one didnt.Think its harsh as I have said on Liverpool but not complaining re our first home game.

Just a shame he didnt bite Rooney the poisonous twat.

A better example:

You hire a driver for your firm.
At weekends, he does some taxi work, and get done for drink driving, and gets a ban.
He wasn't working for you at the time, but for another company. Can you reasonably expect him to be able to drive for you?

I can understand Liverpool not being happy, but they should sue Suarez in that case. He's the one that's caused this issue for them.

In a work situation he would be part of a disciplinary procedure and would be exited from the company as he was unable to do his job.So no I would not expect a driver to continue working as it would be against the law.

They are not an asset valued at 60 Million so different rules apply as is the norm in football.

Yes, I agree, football operates under different rules, particularly in light of his value to the club, but that is Liverpool's choice to stick with him.
One would assume there is sufficient provision in his contract to deal with these issues where they can terminate his contract or move him on. They clearly won't terminate his contract for the 60 million reasons you've said. But that's their choice.

Technically he still is subject to disciplinary procedures by his employer, but they'll choose not to be as harsh as a conventional employer would be.

I sympathise with LFC, but not much. It was reasonably foreseeable that he might commit another offence at some point, and that's what's happened.