Tevez City said:
but he is better player than Torres, and for me he is better than David Villa also.
I know its forbidden to say that a Liverpool player is better than any Barcelona player, but thats my opinion.
Torres and Villa maybe better finisher, more clinical...etc, but Suarez is better player.
I knew someone would bring up Torres. He wasn't worth 50 million either. Roman was an idiot, again. You can say a player is worth what someone is willing to pay if you like but it's rubbish, Torres clearly isn't worth 50m in any known universe. Villa probably is a better finisher, or at least was, but again he wasn't/isn't worth 50 million. He was worth the £35m Barcelona paid for him.
Seriously, 50 million is a lot of money, even by football transfer standards.
Armaan said:
Put it this way, Aguero nor Tevez would create as much Havoc as Suarez does all by himself in that Liverpool side. If people actually bothered watching a few games of his you'd see how much panic he creates in defences.
Panic is not worth 50 million quid. 50 million quid buys you a lot more than panic.
As I say above, 50 million is a LOT of money. There are only THREE transfers in the history of transfers above that threshold. Ronaldo, Ibrahimovic, and Kaka. Now please don't tell me you think Luis Suarez, of Liverpool Football Club, is in that bracket of player.
I don't want to say 50 million again so I'll leave it there. That place that's nowhere near Luis Suarez.