You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Suarez
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
Armaan said:He's one of the very few players in the world worth that much. Criminally under rated by some on here.
Suarez, that you?
He is criminally under rated, but he's not worth 50 million. He's very dangerous, one of the most dangerous in the league, but Kun wasn't 50 million, nor is he worth 50 million, neither is Tevez (who did a better job of single handedly dragging a team up than Suarez is doing at Liverpool). You'd pay 50 million for Ronaldo at his current age, 45/50 for Falcao, and way way more for Messi.
Suarez has certainly stepped it up a notch this season and his finishing is drastically improved, but 50 million? Never.
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,782
adrianr said:Armaan said:He's one of the very few players in the world worth that much. Criminally under rated by some on here.
Suarez, that you?
He is criminally under rated, but he's not worth 50 million. He's very dangerous, one of the most dangerous in the league, but Kun wasn't 50 million, nor is he worth 50 million, neither is Tevez (who did a better job of single handedly dragging a team up than Suarez is doing at Liverpool). You'd pay 50 million for Ronaldo at his current age, 45/50 for Falcao, and way way more for Messi.
Suarez has certainly stepped it up a notch this season and his finishing is drastically improved, but 50 million? Never.
but he is better player than Torres, and for me he is better than David Villa also.
I know its forbidden to say that a Liverpool player is better than any Barcelona player, but thats my opinion.
Torres and Villa maybe better finisher, more clinical...etc, but Suarez is better player.
Put it this way, Aguero nor Tevez would create as much Havoc as Suarez does all by himself in that Liverpool side. If people actually bothered watching a few games of his you'd see how much panic he creates in defences.Tevez City said:adrianr said:Armaan said:He's one of the very few players in the world worth that much. Criminally under rated by some on here.
Suarez, that you?
He is criminally under rated, but he's not worth 50 million. He's very dangerous, one of the most dangerous in the league, but Kun wasn't 50 million, nor is he worth 50 million, neither is Tevez (who did a better job of single handedly dragging a team up than Suarez is doing at Liverpool). You'd pay 50 million for Ronaldo at his current age, 45/50 for Falcao, and way way more for Messi.
Suarez has certainly stepped it up a notch this season and his finishing is drastically improved, but 50 million? Never.
but he is better player than Torres, and for me he is better than David Villa also.
I know its forbidden to say that a Liverpool player is better than any Barcelona player, but thats my opinion.
Torres and Villa maybe better finisher, more clinical...etc, but Suarez is better player.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Armaan said:Well Vinne regards him as "one of the toughest strikers to play against" can't be that bad of a player.
'can't be that bad' ??
He's awesome,a player who would elevate us,they're few and far between - i can't think of a better fit for us,simply brilliant.
Tevez City said:adrianr said:Armaan said:He's one of the very few players in the world worth that much. Criminally under rated by some on here.
Suarez, that you?
He is criminally under rated, but he's not worth 50 million. He's very dangerous, one of the most dangerous in the league, but Kun wasn't 50 million, nor is he worth 50 million, neither is Tevez (who did a better job of single handedly dragging a team up than Suarez is doing at Liverpool). You'd pay 50 million for Ronaldo at his current age, 45/50 for Falcao, and way way more for Messi.
Suarez has certainly stepped it up a notch this season and his finishing is drastically improved, but 50 million? Never.
but he is better player than Torres, and for me he is better than David Villa also.
I know its forbidden to say that a Liverpool player is better than any Barcelona player, but thats my opinion.
Torres and Villa maybe better finisher, more clinical...etc, but Suarez is better player.
I knew someone would bring up Torres. He wasn't worth 50 million either. Roman was an idiot, again. You can say a player is worth what someone is willing to pay if you like but it's rubbish, Torres clearly isn't worth 50m in any known universe. Villa probably is a better finisher, or at least was, but again he wasn't/isn't worth 50 million. He was worth the £35m Barcelona paid for him.
Seriously, 50 million is a lot of money, even by football transfer standards.
Armaan said:Put it this way, Aguero nor Tevez would create as much Havoc as Suarez does all by himself in that Liverpool side. If people actually bothered watching a few games of his you'd see how much panic he creates in defences.Tevez City said:adrianr said:Suarez, that you?
He is criminally under rated, but he's not worth 50 million. He's very dangerous, one of the most dangerous in the league, but Kun wasn't 50 million, nor is he worth 50 million, neither is Tevez (who did a better job of single handedly dragging a team up than Suarez is doing at Liverpool). You'd pay 50 million for Ronaldo at his current age, 45/50 for Falcao, and way way more for Messi.
Suarez has certainly stepped it up a notch this season and his finishing is drastically improved, but 50 million? Never.
but he is better player than Torres, and for me he is better than David Villa also.
I know its forbidden to say that a Liverpool player is better than any Barcelona player, but thats my opinion.
Torres and Villa maybe better finisher, more clinical...etc, but Suarez is better player.
Panic is not worth 50 million quid. 50 million quid buys you a lot more than panic.
As I say above, 50 million is a LOT of money. There are only THREE transfers in the history of transfers above that threshold. Ronaldo, Ibrahimovic, and Kaka. Now please don't tell me you think Luis Suarez, of Liverpool Football Club, is in that bracket of player.
I don't want to say 50 million again so I'll leave it there. That place that's nowhere near Luis Suarez.
Who is saying he's a bad player? I watched the **** in Holland. He's a very good striker, an excellent dribbler and as has been said, causes a load of panic in the penalty are. But he also has his drawbacks, not least his touch which, much like Balotelli's is erratic. Some times his first touch is sublime, but very often it's awful ad he is unable to retain possession. I'm not referring to his dribbling style which often consists of heavy touches before nicking the ball away from a defender.Armaan said:Well Vinne regards him as "one of the toughest strikers to play against" can't be that bad of a player.
He is also, as I have said above, a ****. He cheats not only in diving but in fouling, rather grotesquely eg in last 8 months in PL (on Distin, Parker, vs Wigan today). Alongside the reputation he gained in Holland.
He's a very good player, I haven't seen anyone say otherwise, but he's not a £50m player.
banzaibuddy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 186
Has anyone mentioned he's a racist? And a diving cheat? I don't want to have to start liking Suarez just because we buy him.
kun
Well-Known Member
THIS, THIS and only THEEEEZZZbanzaibuddy said:Has anyone mentioned he's a racist? And a diving cheat? I don't want to have to start liking Suarez just because we buy him.
I would much rather we spend that £50m on Falcao or Neymar or a few slightly cheaper players (Something like Huntelaar, Benat, Isco, Alderweireld)