C
C
Cricket Blue
Guest
Some of the language on here is disgraceful, c words, f words. Very sad
Considering that Braverman is a fucking **** I’d say those words have been used surprisingly sparingly on this thread.Some of the language on here is disgraceful, c words, f words. Very sad
Just other ways to present an argument but hey carry onConsidering that Braverman is a fucking **** I’d say those words have been used surprisingly sparingly on this thread.
Is the problem the use of language (here). We seem to use refugee / asylum seeker randomly and interchangeably. Both I think may arrive through non official channels but may have a very different legal status. I stress legal status as that should at least also be distinct from the moral argument.For the avoidance of confusion to all those who think that somehow refugee's enter the UK illegally - we are signatories to the 1951 convention - these are the relevant sections
ARTICLE 3. NON-DISCRIMINATION The Contracting States shall apply the provisions of this Convention to refugees without discrimination as to race, religion or country of origin.
ARTICLE 31. REFUGEES UNLAWFULLY IN THE COUNTRY OF REFUGE 1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of Article
1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.
2. The Contracting States shall not apply to the movements of such refugees restrictions other than those which are necessary and such restrictions shall only be applied until their status in the country is regularized or they obtain admission into another country. The Contracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonable period and all the necessary facilities to obtain admission into another country.
If anyone wants the whole document is here
Surely you would want to use the words that best describe her within your argument ? Would absolute fucking thundercunt be more appropriate ?Just other ways to present an argument but hey carry on
I've never heard of that wordSurely you would want to use the words that best describe her within your argument ? Would absolute fucking thundercunt be more appropriate ?
Every days a school day :-)I've never heard of that word
Half agree with you.It's designed to polarise the public and divide us into two baying mobs throwing insults at each other, getting more entrenched in our views and shutting down actual debate - just like brexit did. Have a look at the way this thread is going in the last 24 hrs to see the process working.
I'd say the bigotry and the racism present in the thread are more disgraceful than a few cuss words.Some of the language on here is disgraceful, c words, f words. Very sad