True sadly, I thoroughly enjoyed the game last night and some of the comments on here are baffling. We dropped 2 points and the injuries aren't good but it was a fun game to watch overall.
And nobody, let me repeat, nobody, other than City, has played them at their place while they've been missing 5 or 6 players. Other than Leeds perhaps who were 16th at the time and also drew. Hence I believe it's two points dropped.
They title isn't decided in January, but we've already lost at Brighton, Villa and Newcastle, and still have to go to Anfield (where we hardly ever win) and Chelsea.
A bit like when some defended a 0-0 at Southampton a couple of years back when they were in danger of becoming the worst PL side in history.Should have and could have won against a team that I think has lost 7 players to afcon? Poor really
I agree. But this season pushing , tugging, shirt pulling and dueling are being dealt with leniently . At least for some teams . Usually those in red .Personally I thought it was a blatant foul as he was pulling Dias's shirt all the way through that run so I'm not surprised Dias came off second best.
Beat Arsenal at home and City are only a point behind.
Yes they worked hard, still should be beating a depleted side like SunderlandDid you see the game, and how hard Sunderland worked?
Sunderland weren’t really weakened that much except up front which looked obvious to me. They lost one senior defender and one senior midfielder but the replacements certainly looked capable and good luck to them. Le Bris is a decent manager and has the whole squad playing for him. It looks like all those who have gone to AFCON were new recruits over the summer (a couple of them have less than 5 games) so I am guessing the replacements who came in were either existing players from last season or junior players taking their opportunities.
And nobody, let me repeat, nobody, other than City, has played them at their place while they've been missing 5 or 6 players. Other than Leeds perhaps who were 16th at the time and also drew. Hence I believe it's two points dropped.
They title isn't decided in January, but we've already lost at Brighton, Villa and Newcastle, and still have to go to Anfield (where we hardly ever win) and Chelsea.
So, having seen the game, we just disregard what the Sunderland team put into it?Yes they worked hard, still should be beating a depleted side like Sunderland
Can you tell us who are these nailed on starters for them, that was missing last night?And nobody, let me repeat, nobody, other than City, has played them at their place while they've been missing 5 or 6 players. Other than Leeds perhaps who were 16th at the time and also drew. Hence I believe it's two points dropped.
They title isn't decided in January, but we've already lost at Brighton, Villa and Newcastle, and still have to go to Anfield (where we hardly ever win) and Chelsea.
Xhaka, like Rodri for us, is good enough to make his own time and room to play a pass. It had nothing to do with Haaland who had his own battles going on.Think Xhaka is there best player by a distance he give the belief to the rest of the team he keeps talking to him he was continually putting those diagonal balls left and right over our fullbacks! I would of told Haaland his job this game without the ball was make Xhaka or make it difficult for him he had an easy ride always had plenty of time to make a pass!
The difference in O'Reilly when he's got a top defender like Josko next to him, compared with having Ake there was visible. He wouldn't push forward, was scared to pass, caught out of position. He's not been like that all season.
We’ve got to the stage with some now it seems that if we didn’t win 20 games in a row to win the league everything is a total disaster. BizarreThe match day and post match threads confirm one thing. There's some proper entitled twats supporting city nowadays.