You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sven
- Thread starter I am Irrefutable
- Start date
The difference is that Sven got better results than Hughes, and with much much less money. So, IMO, the decision to sack Sven was wrong, but the decision to sack Hughes was right.Prestwich_Blue said:Not much different to the way the current owners got rid of Hughes really. Thaksin wanted instant success and wasn't prepared to wait for it. Thaksin undermined Sven by saying things in public. Hughes was undermined by the club looking for a new manager behind his back.GoForGlory said:I'll always say that the way Thaksin got rid of Sven was a disgrace and I'd definitely have him back at some function.
mancitypj
Well-Known Member
Spot on!barney8 said:The difference is that Sven got better results than Hughes, and with much much less money. So, IMO, the decision to sack Sven was wrong, but the decision to sack Hughes was right.Prestwich_Blue said:Not much different to the way the current owners got rid of Hughes really. Thaksin wanted instant success and wasn't prepared to wait for it. Thaksin undermined Sven by saying things in public. Hughes was undermined by the club looking for a new manager behind his back.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
I wasn't talking about the rationale behind them, just the manner. In both cases the owner undermined the manager.barney8 said:The difference is that Sven got better results than Hughes, and with much much less money. So, IMO, the decision to sack Sven was wrong, but the decision to sack Hughes was right.Prestwich_Blue said:Not much different to the way the current owners got rid of Hughes really. Thaksin wanted instant success and wasn't prepared to wait for it. Thaksin undermined Sven by saying things in public. Hughes was undermined by the club looking for a new manager behind his back.
But if you insist, under Sven we got 1.45 points per game whereas up to his sacking, Hughes had 1.7 ppg this season. But why let the facts spoil your opinion.
Keith Moon
Well-Known Member
He will join a World Cup team, probably Nigeria.
Why don't you count Hughes' first season? Or would those facts spoil your opinion?Prestwich_Blue said:I wasn't talking about the rationale behind them, just the manner. In both cases the owner undermined the manager.barney8 said:The difference is that Sven got better results than Hughes, and with much much less money. So, IMO, the decision to sack Sven was wrong, but the decision to sack Hughes was right.
But if you insist, under Sven we got 1.45 points per game whereas up to his sacking, Hughes had 1.7 ppg this season. But why let the facts spoil your opinion.
Where's this and the stuff about the academy players come from? What happened with kasper?Freestyler said:LoveCity said:Greedy c**t, all he cares about is money, as if he doesn't have enough already.
Any chance we can sign Kasper back as our #2 if Joe is going out on loan again next season?
Kasper can fuck off, he was cheering on the scum both times we played them in the CC and the one in the league.
The Fat el Hombre
Well-Known Member
Prestwich_Blue said:I wasn't talking about the rationale behind them, just the manner. In both cases the owner undermined the manager.barney8 said:The difference is that Sven got better results than Hughes, and with much much less money. So, IMO, the decision to sack Sven was wrong, but the decision to sack Hughes was right.
But if you insist, under Sven we got 1.45 points per game whereas up to his sacking, Hughes had 1.7 ppg this season. But why let the facts spoil your opinion.
What about his first season after adding £50 million worth of players (not including the £45 million or so spent in Jan)!?
NICKS BACK
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Apr 2005
- Messages
- 1,242
Prestwich_Blue said:I wasn't talking about the rationale behind them, just the manner. In both cases the owner undermined the manager.barney8 said:The difference is that Sven got better results than Hughes, and with much much less money. So, IMO, the decision to sack Sven was wrong, but the decision to sack Hughes was right.
But if you insist, under Sven we got 1.45 points per game whereas up to his sacking, Hughes had 1.7 ppg this season. But why let the facts spoil your opinion.
All I will say is Thaksin and Erikkson were the catalyst for what we have now, doubt it would have happened if they had not come. Lest we forget there were an awful lot of higher profile teams around than us that Sheikh Mansour could have spent his money on. Fantastic publicity, and all in all not bad players, Erikkson was extremly unfortunate to lose Bojinov, shows what luck plays in this game. Compared to whAT WE Had to endure before, it was a privelage to watch.
Sven and Frank we salute you.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Because he wasn't sacked on his performance last season. Thought we'd got over threads being hi-jacked by Hughes-Outers. This one is about Sven.barney8 said:Why don't you count Hughes' first season? Or would those facts spoil your opinion?Prestwich_Blue said:I wasn't talking about the rationale behind them, just the manner. In both cases the owner undermined the manager.
But if you insist, under Sven we got 1.45 points per game whereas up to his sacking, Hughes had 1.7 ppg this season. But why let the facts spoil your opinion.