pfazz
Well-Known Member
mancboy123 said:
There is nothing wrong with his shoes.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
SWP- A challenge to all
- Thread starter stonerblue
- Start date
There is nothing wrong with his shoes.
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer
Well-Known Member
Wise to delete tim
Timmmmahhhh
Well-Known Member
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:BlueMoonWalker said:I use to be his biggest mate, I put the moving on to Chelsea as a none starter, chance to better himself etc, though the handling of the affair was niave at best, then I watchbthe kid throw his career away by being a Paris, and content to warm a bench, then he returns to what appeared to All as a chance to reignite his career...... What does willis do? Fool me once, fair play, twice..... Not on the zimmer mans watch
Brilliant, even with the blatent racial undertones....
allan harper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 14,505
Nothing to do with money hes not good enough to get in our starting 11 and the further we progress as a team more players will be replaced.
Timmmmahhhh
Well-Known Member
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:Wise to delete tim
I was actually trying to edit the different strokes bit in, failed again!!
kevilldavies
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 75
I hope SWP re-signs because he has been a match winner and will be again. He knows where the goal is and isn't afraid to have a go.
On the matter of contracts, does anyone know what a contract entails. For instance are players paid when they're injured. Do clubs have insurance for this sort of thing? I know that Owen went to the tossers on a pay per play contract but is this unusual?
One more thing. Where did Nimely, the sub at Burnley, come from, if it's not a stupid question?
On the matter of contracts, does anyone know what a contract entails. For instance are players paid when they're injured. Do clubs have insurance for this sort of thing? I know that Owen went to the tossers on a pay per play contract but is this unusual?
One more thing. Where did Nimely, the sub at Burnley, come from, if it's not a stupid question?
Lancet Fluke
Well-Known Member
allan harper said:Nothing to do with money hes not good enough to get in our starting 11 and the further we progress as a team more players will be replaced.
I agree, wouldn't have him in my first 11 on current form but on the basis that he is quick and tracks back well, I reckon he is a great squad player.
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:I say fuck the little payaso puta, man people are deluded........ You think ian shite shite shite wrote that article because shaun is getting what he wants? and this notion of pay parity, earn it you different strokes mother fucker.
no quote then genius.
Sun Jihai's ghost
Well-Known Member
Pretty obvious what SWP is after.
1) His Gobshite father comes out with these comments about being mugged off. Do you honestly think SWP had not had any conversations with Ian Wright about his pay and contract talks???. It would be naive to think that Ian Wright just went off on one without having talked about it with SWP first.
2) About a week later SWP does an exclusive interview with the sun. This obviously annoyed the manager who commented that he would prefer players to speak to him directly rather than run to newspapers. In that interview SWP had the opportunitiy to distance himself from his fathers comments. What did he do?? repeated the fact that its not about money about 4 times and then made the comment:
"I can't work out why there's still a delay, unless they don't want me and are trying to get me out."
This above comemnt shows utter contempt for the club at a crucial time where we need to be focused solely on achieving 4th place. He has 2 years left on his contract these talks can surely wait 3 more months to the end of the season. If it wasnt about the money then why the urgency??
Bottom line is there was no need to bring up this issue with 3 months left in the season, he and his father are the ones who brought this into the public domain nobody else and frankly they deserve all the backlash they are getting.
1) His Gobshite father comes out with these comments about being mugged off. Do you honestly think SWP had not had any conversations with Ian Wright about his pay and contract talks???. It would be naive to think that Ian Wright just went off on one without having talked about it with SWP first.
2) About a week later SWP does an exclusive interview with the sun. This obviously annoyed the manager who commented that he would prefer players to speak to him directly rather than run to newspapers. In that interview SWP had the opportunitiy to distance himself from his fathers comments. What did he do?? repeated the fact that its not about money about 4 times and then made the comment:
"I can't work out why there's still a delay, unless they don't want me and are trying to get me out."
This above comemnt shows utter contempt for the club at a crucial time where we need to be focused solely on achieving 4th place. He has 2 years left on his contract these talks can surely wait 3 more months to the end of the season. If it wasnt about the money then why the urgency??
Bottom line is there was no need to bring up this issue with 3 months left in the season, he and his father are the ones who brought this into the public domain nobody else and frankly they deserve all the backlash they are getting.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,144
Sun Jihai's ghost said:Pretty obvious what SWP is after.
1) His Gobshite father comes out with these comments about being mugged off. Do you honestly think SWP had not had any conversations with Ian Wright about his pay and contract talks???. It would be naive to think that Ian Wright just went off on one without having talked about it with SWP first.
2) About a week later SWP does an exclusive interview with the sun. This obviously annoyed the manager who commented that he would prefer players to speak to him directly rather than run to newspapers. In that interview SWP had the opportunitiy to distance himself from his fathers comments. What did he do?? repeated the fact that its not about money about 4 times and then made the comment:
"I can't work out why there's still a delay, unless they don't want me and are trying to get me out."
This above comemnt shows utter contempt for the club at a crucial time where we need to be focused solely on achieving 4th place. He has 2 years left on his contract these talks can surely wait 3 more months to the end of the season. If it wasnt about the money then why the urgency??
Bottom line is there was no need to bring up this issue with 3 months left in the season, he and his father are the ones who brought this into the public domain nobody else and frankly they deserve all the backlash they are getting.
Summed up nicely imo.
ono
Well-Known Member
What about the quotes where he mentions the fact that some team mates are on double his salary? Why even mention that if it's not about money?stonerblue said:Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:I say fuck the little payaso puta, man people are deluded........ You think ian shite shite shite wrote that article because shaun is getting what he wants? and this notion of pay parity, earn it you different strokes mother fucker.
no quote then genius.
Quote (not saying from who)
"He is a speed merchant who is loosing his speed. Why would we give him a 5 year extension"
Anyway, Shaun has always been an enigma to me, a myth if you will. He works hard, gets knocked and bounces back up and has given a lot to the club. However the handling of the move to Chelsea was not good, he said first that he didnt want to go, dragged it on and then handed a transfer request to Pearce just before he was supposed to play ina pre-season friendly.
Techinically he is not the best, he is incapable of wrapping his foot around the ball and relies on being able to strike through it with his laces. His crossing is woeful and his first touch is very poor. In the past hsi pace has been his asses but its no coincidence that as that starts to ebb away he is loosing his ability to beat players.
I accept he hasnt directly asked for more cash, i think its more about getting himself a longer deal as he knows himself that his pace is going and he will not get another contract of anything the like he will get at City if he moves on.
"He is a speed merchant who is loosing his speed. Why would we give him a 5 year extension"
Anyway, Shaun has always been an enigma to me, a myth if you will. He works hard, gets knocked and bounces back up and has given a lot to the club. However the handling of the move to Chelsea was not good, he said first that he didnt want to go, dragged it on and then handed a transfer request to Pearce just before he was supposed to play ina pre-season friendly.
Techinically he is not the best, he is incapable of wrapping his foot around the ball and relies on being able to strike through it with his laces. His crossing is woeful and his first touch is very poor. In the past hsi pace has been his asses but its no coincidence that as that starts to ebb away he is loosing his ability to beat players.
I accept he hasnt directly asked for more cash, i think its more about getting himself a longer deal as he knows himself that his pace is going and he will not get another contract of anything the like he will get at City if he moves on.
Gone at the end of the season. Not the player he used to be, not got the same passion that he used to have and not in the same class as some of his teammates.
When (not if) he leaves then he does so with my best wishes and I will have some great memories of him. I don't blame him for wanting more money but I don't think his performances have been consistently good enough to warrant an extended contract.
If we want to renew his contract he should realise we will come to him with the offer, not the other way around. He would be a good squad player next season, but given the performances of the team with Bellamy / AJ on the wings, would he settle for virtually being a substitute? Not a top four standard player in my opinion.
When (not if) he leaves then he does so with my best wishes and I will have some great memories of him. I don't blame him for wanting more money but I don't think his performances have been consistently good enough to warrant an extended contract.
If we want to renew his contract he should realise we will come to him with the offer, not the other way around. He would be a good squad player next season, but given the performances of the team with Bellamy / AJ on the wings, would he settle for virtually being a substitute? Not a top four standard player in my opinion.
charliebigspuds
Well-Known Member
Of course he wants a payrise, I don't blame him, he's good enough to be in our squad and always gives 100% and he isn't on anywhere near what some of the other players are on. But isn't it all coming from Ian Wright on that radio station he's on, he should either tell Ian Wright to shut the f*ck up or come out and say that Ian Wright is talking shite again!!!
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,600
stonerblue said:ono said:"One thing that I definitely don't want to do is get into how much other players earn at this football club.
"Obviously, I know there are players here who earn more than twice what I do. But that's not the issue for me.
Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/breaking-news/sport/soccer/wrightphillips-im-not-being-greedy-14710100.html#ixzz0kPFh486M" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/break ... z0kPFh486M</a>
Why bring it up if it's not the issue. Of course it's the issue.
OK, so when he says, "that's not the issue for me," he obviously means, "yeah. it's all about money,"
FAIL.
Why would he bring it up then (about other players earnings?).
Secondly - Anyone signing off with FAIL is a nob. Grow up
Montgomery Burns
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Apr 2007
- Messages
- 514
Sun Jihai's ghost said:Pretty obvious what SWP is after.
1) His Gobshite father comes out with these comments about being mugged off. Do you honestly think SWP had not had any conversations with Ian Wright about his pay and contract talks???. It would be naive to think that Ian Wright just went off on one without having talked about it with SWP first.
2) About a week later SWP does an exclusive interview with the sun. This obviously annoyed the manager who commented that he would prefer players to speak to him directly rather than run to newspapers. In that interview SWP had the opportunitiy to distance himself from his fathers comments. What did he do?? repeated the fact that its not about money about 4 times and then made the comment:
"I can't work out why there's still a delay, unless they don't want me and are trying to get me out."
This above comemnt shows utter contempt for the club at a crucial time where we need to be focused solely on achieving 4th place. He has 2 years left on his contract these talks can surely wait 3 more months to the end of the season. If it wasnt about the money then why the urgency??
Bottom line is there was no need to bring up this issue with 3 months left in the season, he and his father are the ones who brought this into the public domain nobody else and frankly they deserve all the backlash they are getting.
Spot on. What Ian Wright originally did is just what agents/hangers on do. They have an agenda and let's not be surprised about it. I mean, who doesn't have an agenda? It's like me telling Mrs Burns what lovely eyes she's got, when we both know it's not her eyes I'm interested in at that particular point in time! Too much information I know, but it's how it works.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
stonerblue said:who can find me a direct quote from Shaunny where he says he 'wants more money' ?
I've asked this several times of the SWP haters and not one has found anything.
It won't be Shaun himself asking for more money .... it'll be stepdaddy telling him he deserves it!
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
I equate Wright-Phillips' moaning akin to this.
I sold my house a number of years back for double what I paid for it, within three years.
Do you think the person I bought it off should have any recourse in terms of how much money I made out of it?
Bollocks, you take your chances. He signed-up on £60k a week prior to the takeover, but feels pissed because others have come in a reaped the benefit.
He won't get £60k a week anywhere else outside of the top five/six.
The only way he will get that is to let his deal run down, so we'll see how much the money is important to him this summer.
We will try to offload, if we can get £6m for him, it's good business.
I sold my house a number of years back for double what I paid for it, within three years.
Do you think the person I bought it off should have any recourse in terms of how much money I made out of it?
Bollocks, you take your chances. He signed-up on £60k a week prior to the takeover, but feels pissed because others have come in a reaped the benefit.
He won't get £60k a week anywhere else outside of the top five/six.
The only way he will get that is to let his deal run down, so we'll see how much the money is important to him this summer.
We will try to offload, if we can get £6m for him, it's good business.
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
SWP's back said:stonerblue said:OK, so when he says, "that's not the issue for me," he obviously means, "yeah. it's all about money,"
FAIL.
Why would he bring it up then (about other players earnings?).
Secondly - Anyone signing off with FAIL is a nob. Grow up
what's your ****** problem ******. Why the personal shit?
Anyway, back on topic. Still waiting for a quote