Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
Dubai Blue said:The way I see it is that pressure is unduly put on the referees by the governing bodies (bear with me).Chippy Boy said:The other thing is that refs need to be hauled up as well. It's a complete joke for the ref in our case to say he didn't see it. The video evidence shows him staring at SWP as he kicks out.
The fact is he saw SWP kick out and decided that he wasn't going to punish it. Presumably because he had just seen SWP get scythed to the ground and then kicked while on the floor. And then after the event - maybe having seen it on TV - he decides he's made a blunder and comes out and says he didn't see the incident. What a load of horseshit.
If he stuck to the truth that he did see it and didn't deem it punishable, he himself would be handed a ban from refereeing in the Premiership (at least for one week). So from a selfish point of view, he has the choice of who gets banned; himself or SWP. A pretty easy judgement call to make, I'm sure you'll agree.
Spot on.
Which is why the FA need to say to the ref, "You are saying you didn't see it? Well looking at the footage, we don't believe you. You clearly saw the incident and failed to red card the player, therefore you are subject to sanction xyz."
Not, "Oh OK then, no probs".