Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
1974 buffer zone update
Do you ever criticise Iran for destabilising the whole region?
1974 buffer zone update
Yep, looks like they’ve taken the official 1974 defined demilitarised buffer zone for the time being.
Enemy of our enemy is our friend etc. the thing about tyrants like Assad and Saddam is that you can generally do business with them while you turn a blind eye to their 'leadership style'. Religious nutters are harder to deal with because they are motivated by the perceived wishes of their choice of sky fairy rather than their bank balance - unless you are helping to fund their jihad/crusade etc.Syria = Jihadists good
Afghanistan = Jihadists bad
I'm confused????
Assad was a ****. Is he being replaced by bigger cunts that are going to destabilise the country like Iraq whilst the yanks 'protect' the oil.
Meanwhile the Israeli fascist has taken over Syrian land protected by the UN and that's not a story.
This world is fucked up.
What's right or wrong anymore?
No wonder people go mad trying to comprehend everything that's going on the world.
In a perfect world Syria will become part of the Israeli stateIsrael claim that as there own so I was thinking a buffer past that.
Zero chance, benefits too good hereDo you honestly believe they will ?
LOL. If my ultra-religious fellow Jews are to believed, when the Messiah comes we'll all be part of the Israeli state.In a perfect world Syria will become part of the Israeli state
I do think that the world may be a better place if English public school boys over the last couple of centuries had been told that drawing lines on maps was poor etiquette.LOL. If my ultra-religious fellow Jews are to believed, when the Messiah comes we'll all be part of the Israeli state.
The problem with states like Syria & Iraq is that they were carved out of the French & British colonial empires, with little regard for things like tribal loyalties. As James Barr said in the title of his excellent book, they just drew a line in the sand.
In the French-controlled post-Ottoman territory. Syria was divided into theee or four separate areas, with the Alawite tribe (which the Assads belong to) having an area in the west, on the coast. the Aleppo region was separate from the Damascus region.
These will never be stable democracies, at least not for many, many years. I sometimes wonder if we shouldn't have stayed as colonial powers.
That would involve accepting the ridiculous premise of your question so no. I do remember when the snooker coveage was destabilised by that embassy siege and forming a simplistic view about Iran. In my defence I was 11.Do you ever criticise Iran for destabilising the whole region?