guvnors son mcfc said:franksinatra said:One of the main reasons we have fallen behind in the race for the championship is our inability to score resulting in defeats to the like of Everton, Sunderland and draws at places like QPR, West Ham, and Chelsea.
Consistently these teams have defended deep, with the lack of width in the side resulting in continual failed attempts to play through the middle of these sides particularly away from home rather than the wide open spaces of Eastland’s.
By playing Silva and two strikers we seem straight jacketed in the way we play as he will never be the type of player to hog the touchline, continually moving inside resulting in even less spaces in central areas and even less width in the side.
Arsenal and Chelsea generally operate with one striker a player of David Silva's ilk in the space behind and the width operated by the Hazards and Walcott’s of this world. My concern is if we employed this formation Silva would not contribute the goals of a Mata or Cazorla and so the problem of failing to score would be exacerbated.
Therefore my question would be should we gamble in the transfer window on losing a fantastic player like David Silva next year, whose form has admittedly dipped over the past year and recoup a decent fee enabling us to buy one or two top class player and play two wingers to provide the width, operate one striker with David Silva in the space behind or purchase one winger and lose a Nasri or Milner?
The context of the thread is not to criticise David Silva but to debate the way we play as it seems consistently we struggle to score away from home and the tactics and personnel seem a large part of this.
The main reason is that Van Persie is lethal and has scored goals to secure three points in games that our strikers haven't. They also have the threat of Rooney, the pace of Nani, Young plus that little mexican and Wellbeck who are happy to sit and come in when required. They have more options going forward and that is what wins games and gets three points. We have the better defence as the the stats and clean sheets will prove.
Dzeko is not good enough, Aguero has had a stop / start season with injury and Tevez has only just got going two thirds into the season. Ballotelli never turned up all season and neither has Nasri. Our main player Yaya having two months away to play in a shite competition and our captain and leader being injured for long periods are the main reasons.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:WE need a supplement, or complement to David Silva. He's one of two who is charged or can deliver any creativity. Yaya is the other.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:WE need a supplement, or complement to David Silva. He's one of two who is charged or can deliver any creativity. Yaya is the other.
JamesA said:inbetween said:Might as well sack Mancini as well, get Joe Royle in and go back to being shite, there is a recurring theme with teams that play the 'winger' mentality.
Barcelona, Real Madrid, Chelsea, PSG, Juventus, Napoli, Malaga, Athletico, Milan all manage without wingers.
Incorrect and totally missed the point, or more likely not even read the original post. The point with all those teams and with modern tactics in general, is that teams don't play 4-4-2 with wingers that often anymore, they play a 4-3-3/4-5-1 with fast technical players who can play wide or inside. There is more fluidity to the formation.
Chelsea - erm, what about Hazard/Oscar?
Real madrid - Erm, Ronaldo, Di Maria
Napoli - Insigne/Pandev
PSG - Lavezzi/Pastore
Seriously, you need to read before you post.
summerseat blue said:The one thing all the top teams have that we don't is pace.
its fucking stupid.Dethred said:I'd consider Silva to be the best midfielder we've ever had.
This thread embodies "typical city". Let's definitely fuck off the best midfield player we've ever had.
I'd suggest laying off the acid.