Talksport now (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
ElanJo said:
Manchester City will win nothing. With the squad they had, and the changes at other clubs, City should have won the title by 10-12 points last season, but in the end only clinched it because Chelsea dropped points late in the campaign against Villa, Palace, Norwich and Sunderland, while Liverpool lost to Chelsea and slipped up at Crystal Palace.

We probably would have had we not also needed to get used to Pellegrini (and Pellegrini to the PL), ya know because we made changes as well. Once everyone settled we only lost 2 games all season, 1 because of injury (Demichellis in CM vs Chelsea) and 1 because Scousernburg fucked us over at Klanfield

Kompany, Yaya, Silva and Aguero barely played together also (only started 4 or 5 games together) and I doubt it'll be quite that bad this season.
I'd be more worried if they were bigging us up.
 
mad4city said:
ElanJo said:
Manchester City will win nothing. With the squad they had, and the changes at other clubs, City should have won the title by 10-12 points last season, but in the end only clinched it because Chelsea dropped points late in the campaign against Villa, Palace, Norwich and Sunderland, while Liverpool lost to Chelsea and slipped up at Crystal Palace.

We probably would have had we not also needed to get used to Pellegrini (and Pellegrini to the PL), ya know because we made changes as well. Once everyone settled we only lost 2 games all season, 1 because of injury (Demichellis in CM vs Chelsea) and 1 because Scousernburg fucked us over at Klanfield

Kompany, Yaya, Silva and Aguero barely played together also (only started 4 or 5 games together) and I doubt it'll be quite that bad this season.
I'd be more worried if they were bigging us up.

Let them ignore and dismiss us.

That's what they did last year, and see how that ended.

OK, so the Chavs and l'Arse have strengthened, but so have we. I'm really excited about our additions and whole we can't be sure that they'll all be a success here, none of our buys last summer has proved to be a bust, so why should these five?

In Manuel, Ferran and Txiki we trust.
 
The thoughts of this clown are irrelevant, as with most media columnists he has no clue and cannot help but slag City.
Lets face it, on the strength of the arse beating us in the CS, arsehole wanker is now a legend and world beater and his team unstoppable, like the fat granny shagger. Its laughable and we should treat his silly comments with the contempt they deserve.
 
i feel sorry for the sad fucks. we must have fucking destroyed them with aguerooo, the 6-1 and our double last year.

ha ha ha. i bet they go to bed worried about what we'll infict on them next.
 
de niro said:
Does anyone think there may be an agenda against our club?

Just asking.

I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
de niro said:
Does anyone think there may be an agenda against our club?

Just asking.

I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.

20h2b6v.gif



;)
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
de niro said:
Does anyone think there may be an agenda against our club?

Just asking.

I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.

no paranoia here, in fact a warm smug glow fills me when i think of their hurt and the fact they need to stoop sp low as to build an agenda at all.

still no denying its there. not for the enlightened amongst us anyway.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
de niro said:
Does anyone think there may be an agenda against our club?

Just asking.

I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.
Try this definition fetlocks from Oxford Dictionaries:
"The underlying intentions or motives of a particular person or group".
Hope that helps you in understanding the thread.
 
Using Gandhi to illustrate a slightly odd paranoia over a shock jock radio station, whose sole aim is to provoke the listener into calling in/ranting l/starting a thread about them....Really

Ever heard of an off switch.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
de niro said:
Does anyone think there may be an agenda against our club?
Just asking.
I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.
Is there a Time Travel thread on there too? The repetition of error does not transform it into fact nor does it change the meaning of words. You seem to have trouble with multiple definitions so let me help if you can't grasp other meanings for agenda than a piece of paper with items for business written on it.
Stitch up.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
de niro said:
Does anyone think there may be an agenda against our club?

Just asking.

I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.

<a class="postlink" href="ttp://www.sportsjournalists.co.uk/jobs/men-media-manchester-united-editor/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">ttp://www.sportsjournalists.co.uk/jobs/ ... ed-editor/</a>

MEN Media is offering a unique and challenging opportunity.
Manchester United Editor is one of the most sought-after jobs in journalism and we are looking for someone to manage and coordinate the delivery of top-class Manchester United football content which engages audience across all digital platforms. The successful candidate will be a dynamic innovator with a deep knowledge of both Manchester United and digital publishing.

You will:

  • Drive the MUFC agenda making our digital platforms the leaders in news, information, opinion, analysis, history, data – and fun. You will also lead the social media activity around MUFC- related topics, working with the social media editor on specific audience engagement.
  • Provide a constant source of stimulating, innovative ideas that interest and inform football fans, meeting the requirements of digital audience spikes.
  • Be responsible for populating the MUFC content planning diary all year round and develop compelling MUFC content.
  • Work with the team of football writers – commissioning, briefing and supervising them in pastoral capacity.
  • Be skilled in working effectively with both colleagues and third parties and you will be expected to develop and maintain a network of user-generated content contributors.
  • Manage the delivery of football content in support of digital audience targets and you will support and provide cover for the Manchester City Editor.
  • Be required to ensure all our digital platforms are the turn-to source for anyone interested in Manchester United.

It's everywhere
 
George Hannah said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
de niro said:
Does anyone think there may be an agenda against our club?
Just asking.
I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.
Is there a Time Travel thread on there too? The repetition of error does not transform it into fact nor does it change the meaning of words. You seem to have trouble with multiple definitions so let me help if you can't grasp other meanings for agenda than a piece of paper with items for business written on it.
Stitch up.

I do love you and de niro - you're a veritable conspiracy theory tag team - a bit like Billy and Dismal - we seldom get the monkey without the organ grinder.
Sometimes I picture the two of you in bed together - not in any sexual way, but more like Morecambe and Wise, only you two are funnier.
That you actually attended the same alma mater as myself and yet learned so little is an eternal mystery to me.
Did some clerical error mean that your 11 plus results got mixed up, and a bright child got sent to Offerton High by mistake?
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
George Hannah said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
I believe there's a thread 'upstairs' where the Flat Earth society meet up to try and prove the existence of this imaginary beast - it's usually just yourself, George Hannah and a couple of folk who may or may not be humouring you.
But well done to the pair of you - don't let a complete lack of proof, motive, evidence and logic stand in the way of your endeavours.
When you get a minute, get hold of one of those dictionary things - it's a big book that explains what words mean.
Check out 'bias' and 'agenda', and clock the subtle but important difference between the two.
Maybe confirm this by cross referencing with something called a thesaurus, which sounds like a dinosaur, but is in fact another big book of words.
This will confirm that neither are synonyms, so therefore they don't have the same meaning.
Or live forever in a permanent state of paranoia and delusion, rant aimlessly every time we don't get mentioned in an episode of The Archers, and wear you tin foil hat with pride.
Is there a Time Travel thread on there too? The repetition of error does not transform it into fact nor does it change the meaning of words. You seem to have trouble with multiple definitions so let me help if you can't grasp other meanings for agenda than a piece of paper with items for business written on it.
Stitch up.

I do love you and de niro - you're a veritable conspiracy theory tag team - a bit like Billy and Dismal - we seldom get the monkey without the organ grinder.
Sometimes I picture the two of you in bed together - not in any sexual way, but more like Morecambe and Wise, only you two are funnier.
That you actually attended the same alma mater as myself and yet learned so little is an eternal mystery to me.
Did some clerical error mean that your 11 plus results got mixed up, and a bright child got sent to Offerton High by mistake?
No mistake - Scholarship boy me. Good pick on their part - you can see my academic achievements recorded in gold lettering on polished oak panels in the Hallam hall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top