bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Yes, agreed, there's much in truth in that, but they also devote a lot of time (more time) to sports news based content ie not relying on opinions. For example, in direct competition to brazil, the morning show it much more refreshing, although a bit repetitive if you listen for long periods. I'm not saying its perfect by any means, and I have got into the habit of listening to the footy podcasts every Monday and Thursday. But I think you're also being a bit disingenuous or naive about them having 'lost touch with the mainstream' - whether they take the twitter or non-twitter audience, the supporters of the 'red teams' still represent the biggest chunks of the footy supporting population, and they will still pander to them. It's just numbers.
I agree that most of the media has always focused heavily on United and Liverpool because they are the largest potential audience but these days they seem to target the overseas fanboys more than matchgoing fans. The content (especially online) is largely trivial and juvenile. This is not good economic sense because you make money by selling targeted adverts online and the fanboy demographic is not attractive to most advertisers because they don't have much spending power.
I have no doubt the tabloid press and Talksport has alienated its core support. I make a point of meeting opposition matchgoing fans as much as possible and they usually complain about media coverage (and not just of their teams). In this country a lot more people hate Liverpool and United than support them.
The reason why Netflix is the world's most successful company at present is because it has produced high quality intelliegent content. Thankfully most people are not morons.