Tell blackburn we dont want santa cruz

[cleavers]

This unhealthy obsession with an overpriced injury-prone one season wonder who is "looking for match fitness" after yet another injury and showing average form this season is just plain stupid.

Agreed, its farcical.

 

[cleavers]

we are desperate for a goal scorer.

RSC will be another in a long line of attacking flops at City.

 

[solley attwell]

RSC WAS'NT THAT PROLIFIC IN HIS TIME AT BAYERN THEY SELL HIM FOR ABOUT 4M HE HAS ONE GOOD SEASON AND NOW FAT SAM'S LOOKIN FOR A SHEIKS RANSOM.TELL HIM TO FECK OFF THAT WERE NOT GONNA HELP HIM REBUILD TO AVOID RELEGATION.THERE ARE CHEAPER AND BETTER ALTERNATIVES AND BESIDES WE CAN GRAB HIM IN SUMMER FOR HALF PRICE WHEN THERE'S A FIRE SALE AT EWOOD.DID'NT WE BUY LEE BRADBURY AFTER ONE GOOD SEASON

 

[svennis pennis]

RSC WAS'NT THAT PROLIFIC IN HIS TIME AT BAYERN THEY SELL HIM FOR ABOUT 4M HE HAS ONE GOOD SEASON AND NOW FAT SAM'S LOOKIN FOR A SHEIKS RANSOM.TELL HIM TO FECK OFF THAT WERE NOT GONNA HELP HIM REBUILD TO AVOID RELEGATION.THERE ARE CHEAPER AND BETTER ALTERNATIVES AND BESIDES WE CAN GRAB HIM IN SUMMER FOR HALF PRICE WHEN THERE'S A FIRE SALE AT EWOOD.DID'NT WE BUY LEE BRADBURY AFTER ONE GOOD SEASON

 

[dannybcity]

I'd tell him to do one, it's not the money it's the principle and the precedent it'll set.

 

[Blue2112]

For the price of RSC do we get the Fernhurst as well ;-)

 

[bluezi]

ADUG will step in with any offer but r only prepared to pay the asking price in the last hour of the window, (if Hughes wants him that badly) they have no choice.. they will just go in as they did with Robinho.

 

[jrio]

Don't tell me paying 11m for Bridge wasn't paying over the odds. What's the problem with paying 24m for Cruz? That seems to be the figure they're thinking of. If you don't want to pay over the odds, don't set a stupid precedent. No one's going to pay anything like 18m for Cruz, but equally no one was likely to pay anything like 11m for Bridge. Bridge, remember, was grossly over-priced when bought for 7m a few years ago. 8m would have been generous, giving a "City premium". It costs the fans nothing, because there won't be any increase in ticket prices, nor in any other costs, but buying good players for incredible prices makes the club look like mugs.

 

[ChesterRdBlue]

Don't tell me paying 11m for Bridge wasn't paying over the odds. What's the problem with paying 24m for Cruz? That seems to be the figure they're thinking of. If you don't want to pay over the odds, don't set a stupid precedent. No one's going to pay anything like 18m for Cruz, but equally no one was likely to pay anything like 11m for Bridge. Bridge, remember, was grossly over-priced when bought for 7m a few years ago. 8m would have been generous, giving a "City premium". It costs the fans nothing, because there won't be any increase in ticket prices, nor in any other costs, but buying good players for incredible prices makes the club look like mugs.

£24m, fuck that. Didn't Liverpool pay about that for Torres? Tell Eddie Whopper to do one and we'll look elsewhere.

 

[tufty]

Its times like this I wish Bernstein was still at the helm of transfers.............Remember he didnt want fat bob, was overruled, left because of it, and was proved entirely correct!!!