Tevez can go if he isnt happy - Mancini

[Anonymous]

At the moment,the only way you go to a club at the "next level" after leaving City is to go to-

Barca.
Madrid.

End of.

We are on the shoulders of the rags,Chelsea and Arsenal.
We have the money to compete with anyone and we can keep getting stronger,while the squads at Arse,pool and the rags go backwards.

If Barca or Madrid come in with the right money,I wouldn't blame any player for leaving to go there.Lifestyle,climate-good luck to them.
Just ask the rags about the lure of Madrid to their best players.

But otherewise-why on earth would you leave City to go to somewhere like Liverpool at the moment?
And why the hell should the price be less that was agreed when he signed for us,seeing as how he's had a marvelous season?

This is why none of it makes any sense.
You'd be mad to leave City at the moment other than for footballing reasons-ie. can't get a game.

It's all because we've had decades of "ikkle City" rammed down our throats by cnuts like Taylor...some of our fans still can't believe or accept that we now have players of the quality of Tevez,and thus believe that he could never be "happy" at City.

Fuck all the shit stirrers and rag press tossers!!!

 

[Pigeonho]

At the moment,the only way you go to a club at the "next level" after leaving City is to go to-

Barca.
Madrid.

End of.

We are on the shoulders of the rags,Chelsea and Arsenal.
We have the money to compete with anyone and we can keep getting stronger,while the squads at Arse,pool and the rags go backwards.

If Barca or Madrid come in with the right money,I wouldn't blame any player for leaving to go there.Lifestyle,climate-good luck to them.
Just ask the rags about the lure of Madrid to their best players.

But otherewise-why on earth would you leave City to go to somewhere like Liverpool at the moment?
And why the hell should the price be less that was agreed when he signed for us,seeing as how he's had a marvelous season?

This is why none of it makes any sense.
You'd be mad to leave City at the moment other than for footballing reasons-ie. can't get a game.

It's all because we've had decades of "ikkle City" rammed down our throats by cnuts like Taylor...some of our fans still can't believe or accept that we now have players of the quality of Tevez,and thus believe that he could never be "happy" at City.

Fuck all the shit stirrers and rag press tossers!!!

We're about 10 years and 10 trophies away from you being able to say that yet. Whilst I know what you mean about an up and coming club, never let it be forgotten the likes of Chelsea and united will continue to win trophies, so until we pass them and win things either as well as, or more than them, there will always be a few other clubs to go to better than us other than Madrid and Barca!

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Have to admit, this is the first time I have heard Mancini display the type of balls I want from any City manager.

I posted in a thread a fortnight ago that there were certain players (Tevez in the main) who were agitating and presenting the owners with something between a rock and hard place.

What a disgrace it was that Mancini was having to work within these conditions.

The likes of myself, DD and couple others were dismissed at the time as trying to overplay the situation.

Mancini's comments yesterday have borne out that if there were no issues, why comment at all.

I also warmed to Mancini's comments regarding how fulfilling it should be for both him and and any other player at this club, that success would mean a lot more here.

However, and this is the crux of the problem we have as a club. The owners, and we as fans, either have to accept that big reputations come with even bigger expectations and demands, or we go back to square one.

By that, the focus should move away from the big names we all dream of seeing in a blue shirt, and the focus being more on solid dependable, albeit, still at a very decent level of player.

A sort of step above Everton, I would try to equate.

Now that might be okay for a large cross section of City fans, and it may well yield the odd trophy, but if this 'project' is all about prestige and the making of serious cash is directly linked, then I can't see how it does not remain at conflict between board and pitch.

I have appreciated the cut of Mancini's gib today, but there is an unpalatable truth that top players are impatient, they are spoilt and they want everything now.

Does that fit in with out timeframe. You only have to see the hypocrisy of the type of plyers who will suddently become very interested is us if we do make fourth this season.

They are not coming to create history for us - but for themselves.

Footballers are like petulant kids, give them an inch, any sign of weakness, they will take a mile.

My great fear is that these next two games will be dicatated by agendas.

Which is why I want a strong character in charge, why I believe Mourinho would have been perfect fit.

But Mancini has bared his teeth, and if we somehow do make fourth, he will have achieved something every bit as demanding as his title wins at Inter.

 

[penalty spot]

So Tevez is unhappy with training methods blah, blah. Hughes always went on about players would not like his training sessions because they were so demanding and Tevez is unhappy that Hughes went 5 months after the event.Mancini has not had an easy time since then injuries and playing with Hughes players. As for me I like his style and hope he can get some of his own players in to show what he can do.Tell the prima donnas to do one just like he has done.Now come on City get some good PR people in and sue all these ungrateful journalists probably red ones who sit at eastlands getting the best facilities in the premier league,food conditions etc. and slagging us off.If the atmosphere is good Saturday we might do it.

 

[samharris]

Have to admit, this is the first time I have heard Mancini display the type of balls I want from any City manager.

I posted in a thread a fortnight ago that there were certain players (Tevez in the main) who were agitating and presenting the owners with something between a rock and hard place.

What a disgrace it was that Mancini was having to work within these conditions.

The likes of myself, DD and couple others were dismissed at the time as trying to overplay the situation.

Mancini's comments yesterday have borne out that if there were no issues, why comment at all.

I also warmed to Mancini's comments regarding how fulfilling it should be for both him and and any other player at this club, that success would mean a lot more here.

However, and this is the crux of the problem we have as a club. The owners, and we as fans, either have to accept that big reputations come with even bigger expectations and demands, or we go back to square one.

By that, the focus should move away from the big names we all dream of seeing in a blue shirt, and the focus being more on solid dependable, albeit, still at a very decent level of player.

A sort of step above Everton, I would try to equate.

Now that might be okay for a large cross section of City fans, and it may well yield the odd trophy, but if this 'project' is all about prestige and the making of serious cash is directly linked, then I can't see how it does not remain at conflict between board and pitch.

I have appreciated the cut of Mancini's gib today, but there is an unpalatable truth that top players are impatient, they are spoilt and they want everything now.

Does that fit in with out timeframe. You only have to see the hypocrisy of the type of plyers who will suddently become very interested is us if we do make fourth this season.

They are not coming to create history for us - but for themselves.

Footballers are like petulant kids, give them an inch, any sign of weakness, they will take a mile.

My great fear is that these next two games will be dicatated by agendas.

Which is why I want a strong character in charge, why I believe Mourinho would have been perfect fit.

But Mancini has bared his teeth, and if we somehow do make fourth, he will have achieved something every bit as demanding as his title wins at Inter.

I take it you havent read this then ??

<a class="postlink-local" href="http://www.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=173610" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=1&t=173610</a>

 

[Chippy_boy]

Haven't read the whole thread but I wonder why Tevez would be unhappy?

I mean, Mancini has tough a tough training regime, but so did Hughes. Lots of players gave Hughes stick for that when he arrived. And anyway, Tevez runs his socks off and I can't see him have a problem with intensive training.

Is it his form? Well hardly.

So maybe it's coz he's on the bench all the time? Er no.

Not in the CL? We could well be next year, so no it's not that either.


Or is it because Tevez knows we are bringing in Ibrahimović (or whoever) and he fears being on the bench all the time like he was at the swamp?

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Have to admit, this is the first time I have heard Mancini display the type of balls I want from any City manager.

I posted in a thread a fortnight ago that there were certain players (Tevez in the main) who were agitating and presenting the owners with something between a rock and hard place.

What a disgrace it was that Mancini was having to work within these conditions.

The likes of myself, DD and couple others were dismissed at the time as trying to overplay the situation.

Mancini's comments yesterday have borne out that if there were no issues, why comment at all.

I also warmed to Mancini's comments regarding how fulfilling it should be for both him and and any other player at this club, that success would mean a lot more here.

However, and this is the crux of the problem we have as a club. The owners, and we as fans, either have to accept that big reputations come with even bigger expectations and demands, or we go back to square one.

By that, the focus should move away from the big names we all dream of seeing in a blue shirt, and the focus being more on solid dependable, albeit, still at a very decent level of player.

A sort of step above Everton, I would try to equate.

Now that might be okay for a large cross section of City fans, and it may well yield the odd trophy, but if this 'project' is all about prestige and the making of serious cash is directly linked, then I can't see how it does not remain at conflict between board and pitch.

I have appreciated the cut of Mancini's gib today, but there is an unpalatable truth that top players are impatient, they are spoilt and they want everything now.

Does that fit in with out timeframe. You only have to see the hypocrisy of the type of plyers who will suddently become very interested is us if we do make fourth this season.

They are not coming to create history for us - but for themselves.

Footballers are like petulant kids, give them an inch, any sign of weakness, they will take a mile.

My great fear is that these next two games will be dicatated by agendas.

Which is why I want a strong character in charge, why I believe Mourinho would have been perfect fit.

But Mancini has bared his teeth, and if we somehow do make fourth, he will have achieved something every bit as demanding as his title wins at Inter.

I take it you havent read this then ??

<a class="postlink-local" href="http://www.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=173610" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=1&t=173610</a>

Yes I already had, irrespective of Gary's insight, Mancini has been working against various factions.

So if Mancini's quotes today are false, City will sue.

They won't, because the basic premise of the quotes are correct - it's the headlines and sub headlines which help to twist.

 

[Zin 'messiah' Zimmer]

I respect Gary though the point of the matter here is not the line of questioning but the press getting wind of rumblings behind the scenes. It is a fact that certain players are causing trouble because of there agendas against Bob...... Tevez -just because he's become a cult figure at city doesn't mean he hasn't thrown his toys out his pram, his demeanor the past two games being there for all to see.

 

[Gosford Blue]

I haven't read all the posts but I'll bet most of them will be thinking on the same lines as myself.

The press are stirring shit again. He is quoted, but he also mentions himself and other players.

It's just another piece of misguided, journalistic bullshit.

 

[flb]

But what is Tevez throwing his toys out of the pram about though-he wants champions league football?Perhaps he should have seen what position the club was in before he signed-he must have known that CL football was optomistic at best in his first season.