welsh_andy
Well-Known Member
personally stick him in the stocks, and let him have it, although charge the rags who want a throw,lol
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Tevez fined 4 weeks wages / going to sue (merged)
- Thread starter Halfpenny
- Start date
Freestyler
Well-Known Member
So he's gonna sue Mancini?
If his lawyer has any sense of humour, he'll refuse to come off the bench and defend for him.
If his lawyer has any sense of humour, he'll refuse to come off the bench and defend for him.
Burtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 5,532
Freestyler said:So he's gonna sue Mancini?
If his lawyer has any sense of humour, he'll refuse to come off the bench and defend for him.
Lol!
Ancient Citizen said:BOMBER7967 said:might already have been posted but that no mark **** Claridge was giving it the big one last night, "everyone just assumes that Tevez refused to play", "why did Mancini not speak to the player instead of sending someone else over", "City have handled this so badly"......Blah Blah Fucking Blah!
I FUCKING HATE THAT TWAT CLARIDGE!
Total disingenuous shit from the arsehole that is Claridge. It was 100% obvious to everyone in the immediate vicinity at the stadium and to millions watching that the little twat refused a direct request from his manager. Totally unprecedented and unforgivable is the only slant any right minded observer can put on it, so Tevez and his management creep Joorabchian can fucking swivel. What has pleased me is that City can now do what they want with him, be it 3 years in the reserves/ sell, (at a price acceptable to them), or offload/ counter sue should they so desire.
I believe the real reason is that Tevez saw his arse after falling down the pecking order, justifiably, as Mancini repeatedly questioned his fitness, and chose this route as a way out. Well it's backfired spectacularly Carlos and you only have yourself to blame.
Wonder who the reserves have got next?
Which managers ever go over and tell a player he's coming on? They always have someone to do that whilst they're watching play.
The notion that Mancini would stop watching the game and go and sort out a "misunderstanding" with a player on the bench is bizarre
Burtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 5,532
cibaman said:Ancient Citizen said:BOMBER7967 said:might already have been posted but that no mark **** Claridge was giving it the big one last night, "everyone just assumes that Tevez refused to play", "why did Mancini not speak to the player instead of sending someone else over", "City have handled this so badly"......Blah Blah Fucking Blah!
I FUCKING HATE THAT TWAT CLARIDGE!
Total disingenuous shit from the arsehole that is Claridge. It was 100% obvious to everyone in the immediate vicinity at the stadium and to millions watching that the little twat refused a direct request from his manager. Totally unprecedented and unforgivable is the only slant any right minded observer can put on it, so Tevez and his management creep Joorabchian can fucking swivel. What has pleased me is that City can now do what they want with him, be it 3 years in the reserves/ sell, (at a price acceptable to them), or offload/ counter sue should they so desire.
I believe the real reason is that Tevez saw his arse after falling down the pecking order, justifiably, as Mancini repeatedly questioned his fitness, and chose this route as a way out. Well it's backfired spectacularly Carlos and you only have yourself to blame.
Wonder who the reserves have got next?
Which managers ever go over and tell a player he's coming on? They always have someone to do that whilst they're watching play.
The notion that Mancini would stop watching the game and go and sort out a "misunderstanding" with a player on the bench is bizarre
No point hiding it.
Claridge clearly hates the likes of Capello and Mancini and makes no bones about it.
That makes him an ignorant xenophobe at the very least.
Loser.
EXCLUSIVE: I'll pay Mancini's law bill, says sheik as Tevez considers suing City boss
By Ian Ladyman
Last updated at 10:45 PM on 26th October 2011
Manchester City owner Sheik Mansour has told manager Roberto Mancini he will personally pay his legal bills if he is sued by his former captain Carlos Tevez.
City are involved in an increasingly ugly dispute with Tevez over Mancini’s claims that the 27-year-old refused to come on as a substitute in Munich in the Champions League four weeks ago.
The Barclays Premier League leaders revealed on Tuesday that they were fining Tevez four weeks’ wages — in the region of £1million — after finding him guilty of five charges in relation to the incident at the Allianz Arena.
Tevez has immediately struck back by claiming he will sue Mancini for defamation, maintaining that the Italian’s suggestion that he had refused to play was untrue and therefore slanderous.
However, it is understood that Sheik Mansour is so furious at Tevez’s conduct over recent weeks that he has told Mancini he will foot any legal bills out of his own personal fortune.
City do not privately believe that Tevez will take Mancini to court. Such a move would risk harming the South American’s reputation even further.
Yet the club are ready for anything and have told Mancini they are fully behind him. Mancini spoke with City chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak by telephone on Tuesday night moments after City announced that their internal inquiry had found Tevez guilty.
In that telephone call Khaldoon told Mancini the sheik was determined to do whatever it took to punish the Argentina striker.
It is understood that City’s Arab owners are totally serious when they say Tevez will be banished to the sidelines for two years rather than be sold for a penny less than his £40m value when the transfer window opens in January.
City will also consider launching a damages claim against Tevez if they cannot sell him at the start of next year. They believe his actions have contributed to a severe drop in his transfer value and may yet seek compensation from the player for this through the civil courts.
By Ian Ladyman
Last updated at 10:45 PM on 26th October 2011
Manchester City owner Sheik Mansour has told manager Roberto Mancini he will personally pay his legal bills if he is sued by his former captain Carlos Tevez.
City are involved in an increasingly ugly dispute with Tevez over Mancini’s claims that the 27-year-old refused to come on as a substitute in Munich in the Champions League four weeks ago.
The Barclays Premier League leaders revealed on Tuesday that they were fining Tevez four weeks’ wages — in the region of £1million — after finding him guilty of five charges in relation to the incident at the Allianz Arena.
Tevez has immediately struck back by claiming he will sue Mancini for defamation, maintaining that the Italian’s suggestion that he had refused to play was untrue and therefore slanderous.
However, it is understood that Sheik Mansour is so furious at Tevez’s conduct over recent weeks that he has told Mancini he will foot any legal bills out of his own personal fortune.
City do not privately believe that Tevez will take Mancini to court. Such a move would risk harming the South American’s reputation even further.
Yet the club are ready for anything and have told Mancini they are fully behind him. Mancini spoke with City chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak by telephone on Tuesday night moments after City announced that their internal inquiry had found Tevez guilty.
In that telephone call Khaldoon told Mancini the sheik was determined to do whatever it took to punish the Argentina striker.
It is understood that City’s Arab owners are totally serious when they say Tevez will be banished to the sidelines for two years rather than be sold for a penny less than his £40m value when the transfer window opens in January.
City will also consider launching a damages claim against Tevez if they cannot sell him at the start of next year. They believe his actions have contributed to a severe drop in his transfer value and may yet seek compensation from the player for this through the civil courts.
LoveCity said:EXCLUSIVE: Ugly Tevez in Ugly Dispute By Ian Ladyman
Last updated at 10:45 PM on 26th October 2011
It is understood that City’s Arab owners are totally serious when they say Tevez will be banished to the sidelines for two years rather than be sold for a penny less than his £40m value when the transfer window opens in January.
City will also consider launching a damages claim against Tevez if they cannot sell him at the start of next year. They believe his actions have contributed to a severe drop in his transfer value and may yet seek compensation from the player for this through the civil courts.
Excellent news! Let him rot.