TonyM said:
I sort of like how he questions Mancini. I prefer it when a manager is respected and not necessarily liked by his players. Sven was definitely too soft and I suspect Hughes was only a little less so. I'm hoping Mancini is just that bit more "very much concentrate" 'cos "it's a difficult match", etc... I don't care if he's liked once we are not crap to watch and make less stupid mistakes (both of which were true under our previous managers).
mancini was less than 100% popular in the inter dressing room too. in fact he and viera had a public falling out. I can accept that he uses the dark arts of people management, much as I accept that Kubrick and Hitchcock regularly put their actors through hell in order to get the required response.
popularity counts for nothing really, it's only one way to make people listen to you. what counts is that they listen
and then follow the game plan religiously. equally as important is that they taking complete responsibility for their own performance. I am glad Carlos takes the credit for his excellent displays, as that demonstrates exactly the mindset you want. it's the pay-off for taking full responsibility for his own performance. the talent is his and the work is his. the coach is just an enabler, the more invisible he appears the better. you wouldn't say Fergie made Scholes or Giggs great players. But they did have great careers under him.
I think the vast majority of people who've seen us play recently would agree that there is a definite plan for every player and an overall plan for the team. you can see that it changes from game to game, for example compare how we repeatedly attacked down the flanks in the early stages on sunday, pulling them one way and the other, to our more central attacks against burnley. for examples of how individual players are utilised, I would cite how nedum took up an unorthodox position during saturdays game, slightly infield of the flank and ahead of the defense. under mark hughes, when I could see the gameplan, the danger was that as soon as the pressure mounted, it went out of the window and became a free for all. i would cite the high defensive line against tottenham, as soon as lennon beat us once, the whole team decamped 20 yards further back, reverting to the easy option, effectively conceding the game.
It's a long way of saying, we are a far more disciplined unit now. so even if they don't like everything he does, I believe they are following his instructions. it's quite funny to hear about the training sessions. Initially we were told that the players thought they were not intense enough, now they are too long. what I would say is that the players appear anything but tired on the pitch, unlike so many other teams at this time of year. I think it's true that everyone's had a break, one way or another, under Mancini. perhaps carlos is still bridling a bit at the public way in which mancini demanded his return from argentina... that's just fine by me, it appears his fire is burning as bright as ever. the danger is complacency and, what would you call it, fear? lethargy? apathy?
the site of players hiding from the fight is one we have become familiar with over the years, and for me, mancini's also takes credit for getting this team to fight when it would be so much easier for them to go through the motions. tevez and bellamy are natural fighters, the art here appears to be stoking their fires and focusing their energy. but what of the likes of adebayor? it would have been so easy for him to disappear into the background after his horrible year, but instead he has put it to one side, publicly accepted that his overall performance had not been as good as it might have, and gone about putting it right by really exerting himself on the pitch. the great big grin on his face is the sign of someone pleased with his own honesty and hardwork.
I do accept that there have also been big disappointments under Mancini, in particular ireland and wright-phillips. unfortunately when I look back over stephen's public comments this year, I see someone blaming his form on his managers. does he have a point? I don't know, he has faced some sizable challenges this year....but it doesn't suggest someone looking to squeeze every last ounce of effort from himself in order to overcome them, which is the only way any player survives at the top level. it's so hard to reconcile this with what we saw from him last year. elano, and robinho should be abject lessons. talent is never enough. there is a difference between the players who have a succesful year or two (bentley?) and those who are at the top for five, ten, fifteen years. top class club football requires a different kind of commitment, one that never ends until you retire. even a fantastic talent like rivaldo never had the kind of club career that the likes of viera have. even the sublimely skilled have to remove all mental obstacles and go the whole mile, every day, every year, or they get found out at the highest level, as is happening right now to berbatov. clubs like utd, chelsea, barca have less talented squad players who survive year after year because their mentality is never in doubt. the talented get a couple of years to prove they have this mentality or they are moved on without any fuss.
I still firmly believe that stephen can take this huge, daunting step, if he decides that the pressure of being part of all this is worth the reward. As for shaun, I'm not so sure. He works hard, for sure, but I worry that this is someone who accepted life on the bench too easily at Chelsea. second best might be a little too comfortable an option for him at this stage. I worry about one or two others as well but that's a story for another night.