Tevez suspended - OS

[Thatchersforearm]

Hmmm I'll speak again when I see what the outcome of the investigation is.

I'll be right here on the edge of my seat

SWP your response here made me literally laugh out loud. Brilliant.

 

[pudge]

Limavady United's loan offer to Manchester City's Carlos Tevez

Carlos Tevez has been offered the chance to play Irish League football

Irish League club Limavady United have offered Manchester City superstar Carlos Tevez an escape route from his troubles with the Premier League club.

The County Londonderry team's vice-chairman David Brewster faxed City on Wednesday afternoon offering to take the multi-million pound striker on loan for the rest of the season.

It follows City manager Roberto Mancini's vow that Tevez would never play for him again after the Argentina international failed to come on as a substitute against Bayern Munich in a Uefa Champions League game on Tuesday night.

Limavady United play in the second tier of Northern Ireland football, with opponents including Harland and Wolff Welders and Ballinamallard FC.

Mr Brewster said the club would be willing to take Tevez on loan and keep him fit, if City agreed to continue to pay his wages.

"Pursuant to the well publicised comments of your manager yesterday evening to the effect that Carlos Tevez would not be permitted to play for your club again, may I on behalf of Limavady United FC indicate our willingness to assist you with a difficult problem," his statement said.

"We would be perfectly willing to take Mr Tevez on loan for the remainder of the season or until transfer, thereby permitting him to play football but without the risk of being cup-tied for the Champions League.

"Limavady United play in the championship in Northern Ireland and our manager would be happy to accommodate Mr Tevez within his squad.

"Naturally, our club would not be in a position to discharge Mr Tevez's wages but I am sure you can see the advantages of keeping him match fit prior to any possible sale."

The offer has yet to receive a response from Manchester City.

The BBC has learned Tevez feels his row with boss Roberto Mancini was about warming up and not a refusal to play.

The 27-year-old felt he was ready to play when asked to prepare to come on in the second half of the 2-0 defeat.

Tevez blamed "confusion on the bench" for the "misunderstanding" in a statement on Wednesday.

In his statement, Mr Brewster said he looked forward to Manchester City's "early reply to permit us to complete the necessary paperwork with the Irish Football Association if the matter is to proceed".

 

[morleyswife]

Section 12 paragraph 14 sub heading

Employment law in sporting contracts

Where a individual who under contract with a governing sporting body recognised under National law ( section 2319 government law and sport 1999) has refused to reasonably justify self exclusion from said contract then the contract holders may take the following action

Suspend the thick argie **** ( suspension of dozy **** act 1987) for a time deemed reasonable by contract holders

Removal of spaz downy fuckwit from all sporting and related contract affiliation ( window lick act 1936 ammended under rooney act 2011)

And / or a public kicking and " kick a spaz" event , superceded by hanging ( giggs act 2011 )








Mmmmm interesting

Sorry M8 but I work with kids with learning difficulties

'Spaz' and 'Downy' FFS do you actually understand the terms ???

kids with Cerebral Palsey ('Spaz' to you ) have no intellectual impairments
which begs the question about you

Re 'Downy' [sic] Check out the French film 'The 8th day' .... erm sorry I wouldn't want to patronise you if you'd already seen it....... ??!!


FFS we're all angry about the twunt Tevezbut don't use this as a crap disablist fest

From somebody who works with disabilities a very understated post

Keep going blue and a gentleman

 

[Bigga]

Being forced away from all staff and being made to train 'on his own' would be folly. It would effectively treated as 'slavery', so we couldn't be as extreme as that.

Mr Tévez could not refuse to train with the kids as he would still be involved and anything else will breach his contract further.

I still think City will sue the man after sacking him with the backing of FIFA, who will be frantically re-writing the rules or adding new stipulations in order to strengthen their association.

Wobble your fucking head fella.

You of all people should be well aware of the naivity of that sentence.

Don't be daft! Re-jig the wording as it's tantamount to the same thing!

If Tévez was forced to train on his own as a matter of course for the rst of his contract, or a 'suitable amount', he could quite successfully turn this on its head and claim to be 'treated like a slave/ object', which would not be far from the truth!

Ergo, something as extreme as that would be out of the question. Football is, by most nature, is a SOCIAL event and this would be against his 'human right' to be denied to work with others.

Believe me, it's a workable defence!

 

[Markie07]

Didn't want to start a new post.

But kia is on talksport tomorrow morning on keys and grey according to Durham.


Every one should twit them now and say we don't want to listen to the shit head.

 

[Jumanji]

I "get your drift" but the board believe they can receive more through the courts than on the transfer market and will go for it if they can argue they have a case.

Good stuff. How do you know though, mate? I hope it's true, Chelski were awarded 15 mil for Mutu, we could potentially receive much more for Tevez.

 

[vonksbignose]

I've heard some right old shit on this thread tonight about us having Tevez by the balls.

Much as I'd love that to be the case, the likelihood is that its more the other way round, especially considering Mancini's unfortunate declaration that Carlos's days at the club are over. In light of this, if we stick him in the stiffs, I'd be surprised if he couldn't have us for constructive dismissal.

Therefore, the only option we seem to have is to get rid as soon as possible, although that avenue is seriously undermined too by Mancini having declared that we no longer want him. Any fee that we are now able to bring in will be hugely reduced as a result of other clubs knowing that we want rid!

I'm disappointed that someone within the higher echelons of the club (maybe a press officer, or club lawyer), wasn't on hand last night prior to Mancini going out to face the press. If there was someone with a legal mind watching the managers back, I'm convinced they would have told him to say nothing, for fear of prejudicing our future chances of a positive outcome for the club. Once again, the club appear to have dropped the ball!

With all of this in mind, the only way I can see us getting our 2 aims of a) getting rid of him & b) getting our money back, would seem to be through any insurance policies we have taken out on the transfer fees we paid for him. I would imagine that we are covered in the event of him becoming incapacitated & being unable to fulfil his duties, so in my view, this should be the way the club looks to recover any losses.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure that being an ugly little **** qualifies as a disability great enough to prevent him playing football, & I'm quite certain that the "mental & physical state" that prevented him from warming up & playing last night will have miraculously cleared up now that he feels he's got what he wants.

This leaves us hoping that he picks up a career ending injury & he's far more likely to do that if he's made to train rather than banned from the training ground (if you get my drift)!

I "get your drift" but the board believe they can receive more through the courts than on the transfer market and will go for it if they can argue they have a case.

They will receive not one single penny through the courts! Not one! Look at Mutu.

Tevez has now publicly claimed that he is ready & willing to play when called upon & in his view, it was a misunderstanding about warming up, not about being prepared to play. Whether you or I believe that or not is irrelevent; you can't sue a man for refusing to fulfill his duties when he publicly states that he is willing to do exactly that!

 

[Blue Haze]

After reading that article, it sounds like FIFA would ban Tevez if he attempted a constructive dismissal.

 

[reddishblue]

Let it go to court and see who runs out of money first. Kia will soon be off.

 

[Thaksinssoldier]

Section 12 paragraph 14 sub heading

Employment law in sporting contracts

Where a individual who under contract with a governing sporting body recognised under National law ( section 2319 government law and sport 1999) has refused to reasonably justify self exclusion from said contract then the contract holders may take the following action

Suspend the thick argie **** ( suspension of dozy **** act 1987) for a time deemed reasonable by contract holders

Removal of spaz downy fuckwit from all sporting and related contract affiliation ( window lick act 1936 ammended under rooney act 2011)

And / or a public kicking and " kick a spaz" event , superceded by hanging ( giggs act 2011 )








Mmmmm interesting

Sorry M8 but I work with kids with learning difficulties

'Spaz' and 'Downy' FFS do you actually understand the terms ???

kids with Cerebral Palsey ('Spaz' to you ) have no intellectual impairments
which begs the question about you

Re 'Downy' [sic] Check out the French film 'The 8th day' .... erm sorry I wouldn't want to patronise you if you'd already seen it....... ??!!


FFS we're all angry about the twunt Tevezbut don't use this as a crap disablist fest

I am sick of ignorant posts slagging mentally disabled folk on this forum.

It's one thing ric needs to act on.

The sheer ignorance of some of our members astounds me.

There but for the grace of god goes you gentlemen.