Bill it is totally unrelated to touting. I will say once again the tickets were not sold on the tickets were used by the guys they were for, they were seen in the stadium during and after the game.
Not sure even if people wanted to tout they'd of had much success given the easy availability of tickets.
I just don't get why city can't just say in writing in the letter what it is you are allegedly accused of.
The letter they send tells you nothing and you have to waste time because your first response has to be what have I done.
With the derby a couple of days away it is a race against time to get it resolved not helped by city's lazy initial response.
My point however remains in that even if that person sold it for a grand/invaded the pitch/punched a steward why should you be held responsible when it is not your actual seat but simply an extra seat you purchased for others with the full blessing of city.
The reason city ban you for issues at the etihad is because its your seat and the likelihood is until proven otherwise it is you in that seat however here quite clearly its not as the buyer already had their seat as the club know cos their records show that