The Agenda (Merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: so this agenda thing.

chris85mcfc said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
Most non agendarists seem to believe that the many bad calls we get are just referee error, yes, fine.
Most non agendarists believe that the continued hard draws we get are just channce, yes, fine.
Most non agendarist believe that ffp is the design of the g14 putting pressure on uefa to protect their cartel, i think we all agree on that.
SO WHAT WE ARE LEFT WITH is that non agendarists believe that uefa would'nt be corrupt as to have some pre determind choice to make things harder for the club they have been so open with trying to stop through financial means. Wake the fuck up. Any big buisness discussion in the cellar would have the very same non agendarists saying they are bent as fuck from starbucks to banks to the supermarkets, BUT NOT UEFA, NO ITS LOONEY TUNES TO THINK UEFA. Wake the fuck up people.

What's a 'non agendarist'?
i guess you could'nt argue with anything in my post so came out with that response.
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

everythingchangesbutblue said:
chris85mcfc said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
Most non agendarists seem to believe that the many bad calls we get are just referee error, yes, fine.
Most non agendarists believe that the continued hard draws we get are just channce, yes, fine.
Most non agendarist believe that ffp is the design of the g14 putting pressure on uefa to protect their cartel, i think we all agree on that.
SO WHAT WE ARE LEFT WITH is that non agendarists believe that uefa would'nt be corrupt as to have some pre determind choice to make things harder for the club they have been so open with trying to stop through financial means. Wake the fuck up. Any big buisness discussion in the cellar would have the very same non agendarists saying they are bent as fuck from starbucks to banks to the supermarkets, BUT NOT UEFA, NO ITS LOONEY TUNES TO THINK UEFA. Wake the fuck up people.

What's a 'non agendarist'?
i guess you could'nt argue with anything in my post so came out with that response.

Well given that i don't know what a 'non agendarist' is, im not entirely sure whether i fall into the category needed to put up an argument to your post
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

George Hannah said:
chris85mcfc said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
Most non agendarists seem to believe that the many bad calls we get are just referee error, yes, fine.
Most non agendarists believe that the continued hard draws we get are just channce, yes, fine.
Most non agendarist believe that ffp is the design of the g14 putting pressure on uefa to protect their cartel, i think we all agree on that.
SO WHAT WE ARE LEFT WITH is that non agendarists believe that uefa would'nt be corrupt as to have some pre determind choice to make things harder for the club they have been so open with trying to stop through financial means. Wake the fuck up. Any big buisness discussion in the cellar would have the very same non agendarists saying they are bent as fuck from starbucks to banks to the supermarkets, BUT NOT UEFA, NO ITS LOONEY TUNES TO THINK UEFA. Wake the fuck up people.

What's a 'non agendarist'?
a sad sad mitherer

i wonder what a non believer is?
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

We have had 5 tough draws out of 6 (1st group, 2nd group, 4th group and both knockout rounds) because a) we started off with a lower coefficient , b) because we finished 2nd in the 2 groups we qualified from. Our abysmal 12-13 performance will likely continue to hinder us if we don't win the league as well and that's our own fault.

I don't see how anyone can seriously suggest the draws are rigged without accusing a number of ex footballers (those involved in the draws) of being in on it. It's NWO type conspiracy shit.
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

chris85mcfc said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
chris85mcfc said:
What's a 'non agendarist'?
i guess you could'nt argue with anything in my post so came out with that response.

Well given that i don't know what a 'non agendarist' is, im not entirely sure whether i fall into the category needed to put up an argument to your post
I have seen posters who believe there is a agenda against our club called "agendarists" so i think you think you know what i mean and tbh even the most basic brain should be able to work it out anyway., but lets be honest you had no comeback to my post which is why all you had left to post was "whats an non agendarist?" which is only marginally better then if you had corrected me on my grammer.
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

Another British article in a British paper writing us off against Barcelona.

A quick look at the author s facebook account shows him to be a huge Barcelona fan.

<a class="postlink" href="http://metro.co.uk/2014/12/16/why-there-is-no-reason-for-barcelona-to-fear-manchester-city-in-the-champions-league-4988552/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://metro.co.uk/2014/12/16/why-there ... e-4988552/</a>
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

Silva_Spell said:
We have had 5 tough draws out of 6 (1st group, 2nd group, 4th group and both knockout rounds) because a) we started off with a lower coefficient , b) because we finished 2nd in the 2 groups we qualified from. Our abysmal 12-13 performance will likely continue to hinder us if we don't win the league as well and that's our own fault.

I don't see how anyone can seriously suggest the draws are rigged without accusing a number of ex footballers (those involved in the draws) of being in on it. It's NWO type conspiracy shit.

The draws aren't rigged in the old 'hot ball, cold ball' sense. They are rigged courtesy of a self perpetuating seedings system
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

everythingchangesbutblue said:
chris85mcfc said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
i guess you could'nt argue with anything in my post so came out with that response.

Well given that i don't know what a 'non agendarist' is, im not entirely sure whether i fall into the category needed to put up an argument to your post
I have seen posters who believe there is a agenda against our club called "agendarists" so i think you think you know what i mean and tbh even the most basic brain should be able to work it out anyway., but lets be honest you had no comeback to my post which is why all you had left to post was "whats an non agendarist?" which is only marginally better then if you had corrected me on my grammer.

Best not go there.........
 
Re: so this agenda thing.

everythingchangesbutblue said:
chris85mcfc said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
i guess you could'nt argue with anything in my post so came out with that response.

Well given that i don't know what a 'non agendarist' is, im not entirely sure whether i fall into the category needed to put up an argument to your post
I have seen posters who believe there is a agenda against our club called "agendarists" so i think you think you know what i mean and tbh even the most basic brain should be able to work it out anyway., but lets be honest you had no comeback to my post which is why all you had left to post was "whats an non agendarist?" which is only marginally better then if you had corrected me on my grammer.

To be honest mate i didn't understand your post

If you are suggesting UEFA are corrupt, then you may well have a point

But if you are suggesting that UEFA are single handedly trying to derail our football club by bringing in the likes of FFP, then they can't be to hell bent on stopping us as their attempts have failed

And if you have a problem with our CL draw for the last 16, could you point me towards a team that we could have faced that you would have thought would have been a more straight forward tie? If say we faced Monaco, and we beat them over two legs, would you have still been upset if we had drawn one of the big bad European sides in the Quarter Finals?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.