DontLookBackInAnger
Well-Known Member
It's funnyi both times we have worn it, it's been with white socks.
what clash? since rovers wore blue socks we couldn't wear a dark color?Project said:pretty sure the socks are black - just wore white to avoid the clash
The white socks are from the third kit. We changed as the black clashed with Blackburn's navy.dario2739 said:The strip's really nice - but I hate the white socks. If there's a time that we need to change the socks to avoid a clash then amber should be worn to match the flashes in the shirt!
Banned Tosspot said:The white socks are from the third kit. We changed as the black clashed with Blackburn's navy.dario2739 said:The strip's really nice - but I hate the white socks. If there's a time that we need to change the socks to avoid a clash then amber should be worn to match the flashes in the shirt!
easy just do a newcastle change hardly anythingkippaxkid74 said:I think the kits look great this time. One thing though that concerns me is 99% of fans love this kit don't we - we love the material being different, the cut, and the style/colours.. Yet in 12 months time City will be bringing out replacements! apart from the obvious of how can they alter perfection.. they could have done everyone a favour by announcing they will keep the shirts (even if just one of them) for 2 seasons (like we used to!).
Anyone else agree?
Erm, no they shouldn't. The whole point of having different colours is that they don't clash.dario2739 said:Banned Tosspot said:The white socks are from the third kit. We changed as the black clashed with Blackburn's navy.
The socks to the third kit should be black too!