My brother in law runs a local boxing club and is one of those "fans of the sweet science" types and he had some interesting comments today.
Basically suggested that the problem is that most Big Fight Only watchers are getting really annoyed at Mayweather fights not because of him, but because of the actual rules of the sport. A defensive fighter who can clinch and throw some potshots will ALWAYS beat an aggressive fighter of the same talent level because the referees allow them to stifle the fight. This stifling is well inside the rules and many in boxing, both as a profession and the hardcore set, see it as the perfect application of the sport where you take a defined ruleset and use them to the best of your advantage.
Essentially Mayweather/Pac was a boxing match and people wanted to see a fight which aren't the same things.
Basically suggested that the problem is that most Big Fight Only watchers are getting really annoyed at Mayweather fights not because of him, but because of the actual rules of the sport. A defensive fighter who can clinch and throw some potshots will ALWAYS beat an aggressive fighter of the same talent level because the referees allow them to stifle the fight. This stifling is well inside the rules and many in boxing, both as a profession and the hardcore set, see it as the perfect application of the sport where you take a defined ruleset and use them to the best of your advantage.
Essentially Mayweather/Pac was a boxing match and people wanted to see a fight which aren't the same things.