You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The British Monarchy
- Thread starter west didsblue
- Start date
well done you moron.Whoosh.....
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Any time chief xwell done you moron.
hilts
Well-Known Member
The one that got away? :-)You know, although I understood what the monarchy was about and loved the way the Queen dealt with her duties, I don’t really give a monkeys about the rest of them, including whatever is going on with H&M in the celeb reality space, but when I see Camilla, the Queen Consort, I feel a sense of detest.
I just don’t know why.
hilts
Well-Known Member
If you're gonna escape racism it's the only place to be:-)Who gives a fuck, honestly Harry fought for his country and I respect that but seems he’s been pussy whipped, old white family are set in their ways with racist undertones, shock horror! Now they’ve fucked off to USA just stay there and be irrelevant.
Blue Maverick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 25,348
Ha ha ye the ironyIf you're gonna escape racism it's the only place to be:-)
Rascal
El Presidente
Which is a fair position Macca, so lets explore it.Well I can't abide either of them.
What has made you feel that way?. You cannot abide anyone, that is not the Macca i know and respect.
You never hated anyone, what has changed?And I hate the others too, so what does that make me?
As is your right but see my replies above,I can see and view things and make my own mind up.
Are you unhappy with Netflix or you unhappy with them using the platform to tell what they perceive is there truthI see two people who are quite happy to cash in, via Netflix, on their association with the Royal Family. Neither of whom, it has to be said, would be of interest to anyone or Netflix without that said association.
The Royal Family have the might of the RW press and talk media to proliferate the idea of deference to the Royal family and upper class. Perhaps only Netflix would allow them the space to explain there truth, because you can be certain the Daily Mail would not.
As a Socialist I would argue his labour whilst in the employ of said family is all he has to sell.He, in particular, is selling his family for millions of bucks.
A book on him serving in Afghanistan would probably be a no no on security grounds and why should any person who served in the armed forces have to sell a book to put food on the table
I totally agree, you can chose your friends you cannot chose your family and if his family is anything like mine the dramas he has being involved in are not a patch on ours. We still love each other though as I am certain they do too.I've no doubt he will regret it one day.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
As a Socialist I would argue his labour whilst in the employ of said family is all he has to sell.
Labour is a bit of a stretch Rascal. I'm not sure Labour theory of value and professional handshakers are compatible.
Rascal
El Presidente
If all you have to sell is your labour, whatever that entails then a person in my opinion has every right to take full use of there own surplus valueLabour is a bit of a stretch Rascal. I'm not sure Labour theory of value and professional handshakers are compatible.
The notion that a person by birthright has no surplus value is nonsense,
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
If all you have to sell is your labour, whatever that entails then a person in my opinion has every right to take full use of there own surplus value
The notion that a person by birthright has no surplus value is nonsense,
Because it isn't Labour. He doesn't/or didn't produce surplus value by hard work or skill. This is incoherent.
He got a rather good deal in return for the "work" that he was expected to carry out.
Perhaps he should have setup a union or a soviet and gone on strike with Uncle Nonce and some lesser royals.
Can you name anyone with more favourable terms without more responsibility? But the press coverage and scrutiny and effect on his family is something he couldn't bear.
Rascal
El Presidente
You have no idea of the concept do you.Because it isn't Labour. He doesn't/or didn't produce surplus value by hard work or skill. This is incoherent.
He didnt, perhaps the racism they claim they encountered made that deal seem a lot less than he expectedHe got a rather good deal in return for the "work" that he was expected to carry out.
I have read this sentence three times and each time it has made less sense.Perhaps he should have setup a union or a soviet and gone on strike with Uncle Nonce and some lesser royals.
I have no idea what his duties responsibilities etc were, so who can we possibly compare withCan you name anyone with more favourable terms without more responsibility?
When you grow up as a kid with the notion the media have helped your mum, maybe that its understandableBut the press coverage and scrutiny and effect on his family is something he couldn't bear.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
You have no idea of the concept do you.
He didnt, perhaps the racism they claim they encountered made that deal seem a lot less than he expected
I have read this sentence three times and each time it has made less sense.
I have no idea what his duties responsibilities etc were, so who can we possibly compare with
When you grow up as a kid with the notion the media have helped your mum, maybe that its understandable
Yes I have no issue with him deciding he doesn't want to live in that kind of scrutiny, it is unfortunately an occupational hazard but he is an entitled to relocate.
If that's the case explain it to me then, I believe the concept as understood by marxists to be theoretical drivel but as the scholar, you possess the knowledge and skill to describe it to the fool.
Where does the surplus value go?
If it is to the family firm of which he took cut of "profits" and received expenses and accommodation, then he was more a shareholder than an employee.
Doesn't fit in this description below.
He can be compared to his brother and his father, he might feel out of place at only being a spare. But he received many of the benefits without the same burden of responsibility.
I'm not convinced you aren't just wumming.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
I find it amazing Harry and his Mrs are deemed more of a threat to the future of the Royal family and its future than Prince Andrew is?
Rascal
El Presidente
Yes I have no issue with him deciding he doesn't want to live in that kind of scrutiny, it is unfortunately an occupational hazard but he is an entitled to relocate.
If that's the case explain it to me then, I believe the concept as understood by marxists to be theoretical drivel but as the scholar, you possess the knowledge and skill to describe it to the fool.
Where does the surplus value go?
If it is to the family firm of which he took cut of "profits" and received expenses and accommodation, then he was more a shareholder than an employee.
Doesn't fit in this description below.
He can be compared to his brother and his father, he might feel out of place at only being a spare. But he received many of the benefits without the same burden of responsibility.
I'm not convinced you aren't just wumming.
At least you are watching Prof Wolfe, he is magnificent. There is a vid out there where he takes apart that charlatan Jordan Peterson, watch it if you can.
Surplus value is inherent to oneself, it is your worth to society. That worth can be expolited by capitalists for their own gain.Harry and Mehgan have used there surplus value to make a film that the capitalists will exploit but at least harry and his family make some dough out of it.
This though is not really about Harry is it. Its all about Meghan and her percieved maniupulation of a soldier who went through all that training
And there is also the other thing that is not spoke about. If the Prince of wales was to pass away before his old fella Harry would be King.
Harry and Meghan have got mixed race kids. A person of "colour" ascending the throne. the gammons would be apopletic.
It’s all a bit ‘old man shouts at clouds’ this thread for the most part.You have no idea of the concept do you.
He didnt, perhaps the racism they claim they encountered made that deal seem a lot less than he expected
I have read this sentence three times and each time it has made less sense.
I have no idea what his duties responsibilities etc were, so who can we possibly compare with
When you grow up as a kid with the notion the media have helped your mum, maybe that its understandable
That was meant to be a reply to @bluethrunthru sorry.
Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 12,090
Harry’s fifth in line not secondAt least you are watching Prof Wolfe, he is magnificent. There is a vid out there where he takes apart that charlatan Jordan Peterson, watch it if you can.
Surplus value is inherent to oneself, it is your worth to society. That worth can be expolited by capitalists for their own gain.Harry and Mehgan have used there surplus value to make a film that the capitalists will exploit but at least harry and his family make some dough out of it.
This though is not really about Harry is it. Its all about Meghan and her percieved maniupulation of a soldier who went through all that training
And there is also the other thing that is not spoke about. If the Prince of wales was to pass away before his old fella Harry would be King.
Harry and Meghan have got mixed race kids. A person of "colour" ascending the throne. the gammons would be apopletic.
Rascal
El Presidente
If Wiiliam croaks it, he is second. The line breaks ... thats how we got Queen lizHarry’s fifth in line not second
Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 12,090
No. Edward VIII had no children so it went to his brother then his first child, Princess Elizabeth. Although if George VI had fathered a son then that child would have taken her place. That rule has now changed.If Wiiliam croaks it, he is second. The line breaks ... thats how we got Queen liz
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
At least you are watching Prof Wolfe, he is magnificent. There is a vid out there where he takes apart that charlatan Jordan Peterson, watch it if you can.
Surplus value is inherent to oneself, it is your worth to society. That worth can be expolited by capitalists for their own gain.Harry and Mehgan have used there surplus value to make a film that the capitalists will exploit but at least harry and his family make some dough out of it.
I'm not really sure the concept extends to people with their own media production companies, who employ other people to record and edit material.
Unless they have their own distribution channels they will always receive a fraction of the "value", but it doesn't follow that there is any exploitation unless they have been poorly advised into striking a deal that grossly undervalues the product.
Otherwise the same argument extends to the highest paid Hollywood actor-producers.
This though is not really about Harry is it. Its all about Meghan and her percieved maniupulation of a soldier who went through all that training
And there is also the other thing that is not spoke about. If the Prince of wales was to pass away before his old fella Harry would be King.
Harry and Meghan have got mixed race kids. A person of "colour" ascending the throne. the gammons would be apopletic.
3/4 white, so the Gammons probably wouldn't notice.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
If Wiiliam croaks it, he is second. The line breaks ... thats how we got Queen liz
I don't think it works like that.
If William died, and then Charles also died before George was 18, George would be king but not ascend to the throne, Harry would be first in line to be Regent.
Regents have to be resident in the country though, so they'd have to move back.
If Harry was ineligible or declined, it would be.... Andrew.