Why is your font getting bigger and bigger haha?Well if she’s doing a masters in law, I’m not surprised she’s not met an advocate of this particular government to be fair! ;)
On communication, absolutely. That’s why I have such an issue with this government though (as plenty of centrist conservatives do too). They’re so bad at justifying their position and seeking to avoid scrutiny that their motives always have to be questioned. If they had a decent argument, they wouldn’t need to be as deliberately disingenuous as they always are.
On the third paragraph, what the university should do, and they do do, is be clear on who their lecturers are and what their teachings on the subject will cover. It’s higher education, they should not follow a set criteria, that’s not what the good universities in particular are there for. You enrol at Oxford because you want to hear Dawkins thoughts specifically for example.
It isn’t in university’s interests to take it to the extreme, people just won’t go and it goes against their own principles of independent thought and what academia is in general.
The question is ultimately who do you believe is best placed to ensure minimal political influence in further education - the academics or the political power in charge at the time. Like I said, there’s a reason even conservatives are critical of increasing political influence in this space and see it as a non issue.
I didn’t mean her meeting Tories, I meant someone with conservative views which is actually a criticism of the Tories as over the last two/three decades, they have shifted towards liberalism.
But they’re not introducing political influence, other than policing campuses to ensure everyone is getting to speak and being heard and I think it’s very much needed. You’ve already admitted there is legislation in place to stop extremism, so you must somewhat agree with the state intervening.
Which Tories are against it?