hampshireblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 1,381
That's fine, but... The banks are regularly fined for breaking the law, pay their fines and move on, and then do the same a few years later. Now if there were some sensible caveats to when and how much bonuses were then fine, but this gives them carte blanche to carry on in the same way.Not trawling through this thread, but the left's objections to the removal of the cap on bankers' bonuses is deeply flawed and the media coverage of it, pitiful.
It's as if the left think the government pays the bankers. They do not; the banks do.
Removing the cap isn't the government "giving the rich" anything, because they aren't giving them anything in the first place. In fact, if the bankers get paid more and since 99.99% of them, if not 100% are on PAYE, then the government will receive more tax, not less.
All this change is about is the government saying (quite rightly), "how much a company wants to pay its employees is fuck all to do with the government, and it is entirely wrong for the government to be meddling in companies' affairs by setting wage caps".
If wage caps on bankers' bonuses are OK, then why not caps on footballers pay? So we could encourage all the top talent to fuck off out of the UK and play abroad. I am sure that would be popular, NOT. So it seems people are quite happy for us to attract the best footballers with attractive pay packages, but that's not OK for our banks? That's a ludicrous position for the lefties to take. Many are bitter and resentful idiots though, so not unexpected.
There is no evidence that the bonus and tax regime is a disincentive to attracting the right people. This is more about the fact that this was an EU wide policy.