Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,135
Ok. Who put you in charge of determining what punishment fits which crime?Now that’s an illogical extrapolation - the punishment should fit the crime.
Ok. Who put you in charge of determining what punishment fits which crime?Now that’s an illogical extrapolation - the punishment should fit the crime.
0.85 per 100k at increasing.
1.12 per 100k in the U.K. and decreasing.
14.4 per 100k in the US.
Yeah, it shows no deterrent at all.There you go
Ok. Who put you in charge of determining what punishment fits which crime?
Yeah, it shows no deterrent at all.
Lol. It isn’t. You’ve decided in your own mind what crime deserves what punishment, without any expertise.Strawman
No it would cost a fortune in appeals and the likes of @gordondaviesmoustache would make a ‘killing’ off it.maybe but it would save a fortune feeding them for 30 years .
Lol. It isn’t. You’ve decided in your own mind what crime deserves what punishment, without any expertise.
If it doesn’t act as a deterrent, then it becomes an aspect of a moral and conscious decision making process about whether to murder or not.Illogical
A deterrent doesn’t deter everyone but may deter some