Interesting little fantasy you’re peddling there about the lack of austerity under that Labour government.
They had a deficit of over 6% of GDP in 1946 and turned it into a surplus of 4% in 1951, with the tax burden rising sharply as well.
Public investment did rise, but it’s an lot easier to do that when health care expenditure is running at 3% of GDP versus 7%-plus currently and social security was half of what we’re spending now as well.
Do you advocate reducing welfare and health spending by 60% so that we can revive the railways again?