Fred_Quimby
Well-Known Member
This gambling thing has to be more than a couple of people for it to be highlighted.
The Conservative Party
- Thread starter dave_blue12
- Start date
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,220
carlosthejackal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 4,471
No evidence of corruption
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,346
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
If they would break rules to gamble for a few hundred quid imagine what other illegal bit time stuff they do. Fkin brazen they are.
Fred_Quimby
Well-Known Member
Rishi ir really angry.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Laura Saunders statement:
"It is inappropriate to conduct any investigation of this kind via the media, and doing so risks jeopardising the work of the Gambling Commission and the integrity of its investigation.
"The publication of the BBC's story is premature and is a clear infringement of Ms Saunders' privacy rights.
"She is considering legal action against the BBC and any other publishers who infringe her privacy rights."
Yet her husband has stepped back from his duties.
"It is inappropriate to conduct any investigation of this kind via the media, and doing so risks jeopardising the work of the Gambling Commission and the integrity of its investigation.
"The publication of the BBC's story is premature and is a clear infringement of Ms Saunders' privacy rights.
"She is considering legal action against the BBC and any other publishers who infringe her privacy rights."
Yet her husband has stepped back from his duties.
Gareth Barry Conlon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2014
- Messages
- 14,725
Fuck Me, is she seriously arguing that she has the right to break the law in private while at same time she is trying get elected to public office?
They really are the Party of Organised Spivvery
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,340
One last grift…
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,340
Even her statement is piss poor.
There is no such thing as a right to privacy. English law does not recognise the concept.
What she does have is a right to respect for her private life. That is a right that must be balanced against the rights of others to freedom of expression.
In the context of an attempt to suppress news of a criminal investigation while simultaneously running for public office, as you say that is quite a stretch.