I don’t defend them particularly mate and I was only talking about this particular food parcel not the government as a whole.
Looking at what you said:
Rashfords campaign. So the government originally figured we don’t feed kids during school holidays so we aren’t going to now. I understand the point they were making but it completely lacked any form of compassion or thought. At some point and for reasons we will never know it fairly quickly realised it needed to provide support during school holidays. But whatever their reasons the government fucked up, they should not have said “we don’t do that” they should have said “we will look in to it and revert”. So we agree on this although if they were as uncaring as they made out surely they would have stuck to their guns here?
On the vouchers, personally I don’t even think that is the best way but it’s better than food parcels...fucks sake it’s like they are some sort of refugee. Just give people cash in their bank. Sorted and carries not a whiff of social stigma, people are generally quite private and don’t like their business being broadcast. Unfortunately our politics is so often about focusing on the few not the many when criticising the other. Most people can look after themselves and their kids perfectly well. All hues do it.
I can’t agree with the point about this food parcels scheme being about dodgy deals. The government will want £30 of food provided not pictures of half full boxes because some cock is on the fiddle. It’s an easy accusation to make and often impossible to refute or prove. So it sticks. Especially if they have form so I get why you would immediately think it. But in this case they were far enough removed from the contract to legitimately say “nowt to do with me”. There is plenty of other stuff we can look at and say this smells a bit but I just don’t see that being the case here